共 42 条
CD10(+) and CK7/RON(-) Cell Carcinoma, Conventional Type With Eosinophilic Morphology From its Mimickers
被引:10
|作者:
Yasir, Saba
[1
,5
]
Herrera, Loren
[1
,5
]
Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen
[1
]
Reis, Isildinha M.
[2
,3
]
Umar, Saleem
[1
]
Leveillee, Raymond
[4
]
Kava, Bruce
[4
]
Jorda, Merce
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, UM Sylvester Biostat & Bioinformat Core, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[4] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[5] Jackson Mem Hosp, Dept Pathol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源:
关键词:
renal cell carcinoma conventional type;
with eosinophilic morphology;
chromophobe renal cell carcinoma eosinophilic variant;
renal oncocytoma;
RENAL EPITHELIAL NEOPLASMS;
DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS;
ONCOCYTOMA;
TUMORS;
CLASSIFICATION;
EXPRESSION;
KIT;
RCC;
CYTOKERATIN-7;
FEATURES;
D O I:
10.1097/PAI.0b013e31823fecd3
中图分类号:
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学];
R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号:
100101 ;
摘要:
Background: The distinction between renal cell carcinoma conventional (clear cell) type with eosinophilic morphology (ccRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma eosinophilic variant (chRCC), and renal oncocytoma (RO) is a common diagnostic dilemma. We aimed to identify an immunohistochemical panel to discriminate ccRCC from its morphologic mimics. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three renal neoplasms (19 ccRCC, 18 chRCC, and 16 RO) were selected. Immunohistochemical stains for CD10, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), c-Kit, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cadherin), and Recepteur d'origine nantais (RON) were performed. Results: Ten (53%) of 19 ccRCC were positive for CD10, 11 (58%) for E-cadherin, 8 (42%) for N-cadherin, 5 (26%) for Ksp-cadherin, 9 (47%) for RON, 6 (32%) for CK7, and 5 (26%) for c-Kit. In chRCC/RO group, 5 of 34 (15%) were positive for CD10, 32 (94%) for E-cadherin, 2 (6%) for N-cadherin, 1 (3%) for Ksp-cadherin, 22 (65%) for RON, 14 (41%) for CK7, and 25 (25/32, 76%) for c-kit. Univariately, negative c-Kit [odds ratio (OR) = 8.75, P = 0.001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.747], negative E-cadherin (OR = 11.64, P = 0.005, AUC = 0.681), positive N-cadherin (OR = 11.64, P = 0.005, AUC = 0.681), positive Ksp-cadherin (OR = 11.79, P = 0.031, AUC = 0.617), and positive CD10 (OR = 6.44, P = 0.005, AUC = 0.690) detects ccRCC versus chRCC/RO. Multivariate analysis showed significant association between CD10 positivity and ccRCC (OR = 16.90, P = 0.007) and between RON negativity and ccRCC (OR = 7.17, P = 0.047) when CK7 is negative. Conclusions: The best single predictors for ccRCC are negative c-Kit, negative E-cadherin, positive N-cadherin, positive Ksp-cadherin, and positive CD10. However, considering the studied markers, a combination of positive CD10 and negative CK7 and RON is considered the best immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing ccRCC from chRCC/RO.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 461
页数:8
相关论文