Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process

被引:3
|
作者
Winkler, Jonas [1 ]
Sculean, Anton [2 ]
Gkantidis, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
gingiva; mucosa; alveolar process; digital dental model; three-dimensional imaging; surface model; PRECISION;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11216389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tested using 3D surface superimpositions on the following reference areas: the buccal front teeth area, the entire dental arch, the entire alveolar process, or single teeth by applying an iterative closest point algorithm. Following each superimposition, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between predefined 3D model surfaces was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed through non-parametric statistics and the visualization of color-coded distance maps. When superimpositions were performed on the alveolar process, the median scanner precision was below 0.05 mm, with statistically significant but negligible differences between scanners. The agreement between the scanners was approximately 0.06 mm. When single-tooth superimpositions were used to assess the precision of adjacent alveolar soft-tissue surfaces, the median error was 0.028 mm, and there was higher agreement between the scanners. The in vivo reliability of the intraoral scanners in the alveolar surface area was high overall. Single-tooth superimpositions should be preferred for the optimal assessment of neighboring alveolar surface areas relative to the dentition.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Publisher Correction: Automated caries detection in vivo using a 3D intraoral scanner
    Stavroula Michou
    Mathias S. Lambach
    Panagiotis Ntovas
    Ana R. Benetti
    Azam Bakhshandeh
    Christos Rahiotis
    Kim R. Ekstrand
    Christoph Vannahme
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [22] Execution of Plastic Parts Using 3D Scanners and 3D Printers
    Bucuresteanu, Anca
    Prodan, Dan
    Motomancea, Adrian
    [J]. MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2018, 55 (02) : 215 - 218
  • [23] Comparison of Optical and Laser 3D Scanners
    Toth, Teodor
    Rajt'ukova, Viktoria
    Zivcak, Jozef
    [J]. 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (CINTI), 2013, : 79 - 82
  • [24] Turning Mobile Phones into 3D Scanners
    Kolev, Kahn
    Tanskanen, Petri
    Speciale, Pablo
    Pollefeys, Marc
    [J]. 2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2014, : 3946 - 3953
  • [26] 3D whole body scanners revisited
    Daanen, H. A. M.
    Ter Haar, F. B.
    [J]. DISPLAYS, 2013, 34 (04) : 270 - 275
  • [27] Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method
    Nedelcu, R.
    Olsson, P.
    Nystrom, I.
    Ryden, J.
    Thor, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 69 : 110 - 118
  • [28] Intraoral 3D Scanning in Cleft Care
    Chaudhari, Prabhat Kumar
    Kharbanda, O. P.
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2017, 54 (05): : 618 - 618
  • [29] Cleft Care: Intraoral 3D Scanning
    Radojicic, Julija
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (09): : 1330 - 1330
  • [30] In Vivo Analysis of Intraoral Scanner Precision Using Open-Source 3D Software
    Lo Giudice, Roberto
    Galletti, Cosimo
    Tribst, Joao Paulo Mendes
    Melenchon, Laia Perez
    Matarese, Marco
    Miniello, Alessandra
    Cucinotta, Filippo
    Salmeri, Fabio
    [J]. PROSTHESIS, 2022, 4 (04): : 554 - 563