EFFECT OF NARROW DIAMETER IMPLANTS ON CLINICAL OUTCOME

被引:1
|
作者
Fanali, S. [1 ]
Lopez, M. A.
Bassi, M. Andreasi
Confalone, L.
Zollino, I. [2 ]
Carinci, F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ G DAnnunzio, Dept Oral Sci Nano & Biotechnol, Chieti, Italy
[2] Univ Ferrara, Dept DMCCC, Sect Maxillofacial & Plast Surg, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
Two-pieces; implant; fixture; bone; loading;
D O I
10.1177/1721727X120100S207
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Narrow diameter-implants (NDI) (i.e. diameter 3.75 mm) are a potential solution for specific clinical situations such as reduced interradicular bone, thin alveolar crest and replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. NDI have been available in clinical practice since the nineties but only a few studies have analyzed their clinical outcome. Since no report is available on a new type of implants, a retrospective study was performed. A total of 47 narrow diameter (i.e. x <= 3.40 mm) two-piece implants (FMD srl, Rome, Italy) were inserted, 35 in females and 12 in males. The median age was 60 +/- 11 (min-max 30-80 years). Implants were inserted 22 in the maxilla and 25 in the mandible; they replaced 11 incisors, 3 cuspids, 21 premolars and 12 molars. Implant' length was shorter than 10 mm, 10.30 <= x <= 12.30, equal to 13 mm and longer than 13 mm in 17, 28, 1 and 1 fixtures, respectively. Implant' diameter was narrower than 3.5 mm. There were 3, 18 and 26 Elisir, 1-fix and Shiner implant types. No implant on single tooth rehabilitations was lost and thus survival rate was 100%. Then pen-implant bone resorption (i.e. delta IAJ) was used to investigate SCR. Seven fixtures have a crestal bone resorption greater than 1.5 mm (SCR = 85.1). Statistical analysis demonstrated that diabetes (p=0.044) and smoke (p=0.001) have a higher pen-implant crestal bone resorption. In conclusion FMD implants are reliable devices for oral rehabilitation with a very high SCR and SVR although smoker and diabetic patients have a worse clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Narrow-diameter implants: A restorative option for limited interdental space
    Froum, Stuart J.
    Cho, Sang-Choon
    Cho, Young Sung
    Elian, Nicolas
    Tarnow, Dennis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 27 (05) : 449 - 456
  • [32] A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrow-diameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla
    Andersen, E
    Saxegaard, E
    Knutsen, BM
    Haanæs, HR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2001, 16 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [33] Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study
    Arisan, Volkan
    Bolukbasi, Nilufer
    Ersanli, Selim
    Ozdemir, Tayfun
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (03) : 296 - 307
  • [34] Healing differences in narrow diameter implants submitted to immediate and conventional loading in mandibular overdentures: A randomized clinical trial
    Bielemann, Amalia Machado
    Marcello-Machado, Raissa Micaella
    Schuster, Alessandra Julie
    Chagas Junior, Otacilio Luiz
    Del Bel Cury, Altair Antoninha
    Faot, Fernanda
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (03) : 241 - 250
  • [35] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants-1-year follow-up
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Nilsson, Peter
    King, Paul
    Becktor, Jonas
    Speroni, Stefano
    Schramm, Alexander
    Maiorana, Carlo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) : 609 - 616
  • [36] A clinical and radiological long-term follow-up study of narrow diameter implants in the aesthetic area
    Trbakovic, Amela
    Bongenhielm, Ulf
    Thor, Andreas
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04) : 598 - 605
  • [37] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow-diameter implants: 3 years follow-up
    Maiorana, Carlo
    King, Paul
    Quaas, Sebastian
    Sondell, Katarina
    Worsaae, Nils
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [38] EFFECT OF ONE-PIECE IMPLANT DIAMETER ON CLINICAL OUTCOME
    Fanali, S.
    Carinci, F.
    Zollino, I.
    Brunelli, G.
    Monguzzi, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION, 2011, 9 (03) : 7 - 12
  • [39] Clinical evaluation of narrow-diameter implants versus standard-diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Xiao-meng
    Liu, Bei-lei
    Qian, Shu-Jiao
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Zhang, Xiao
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (12) : 1245 - 1253
  • [40] Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cruz, R. S.
    Lemos, C. A. A.
    de Batista, V. E. S.
    Yogui, F. C.
    Oliveira, H. F. F.
    Verri, F. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (05) : 674 - 682