Alternating mini-BEAM/ESHAP as salvage therapy for refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

被引:16
|
作者
Caballero, MD [1 ]
Amigo, ML [1 ]
Hernandez, JM [1 ]
Vazquez, L [1 ]
delCanizo, C [1 ]
Gonzalez, M [1 ]
Garcia, R [1 ]
SanMiguel, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] HOSP UNIV SALAMANCA, SERV HEMATOL, E-37007 SALAMANCA, SPAIN
关键词
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; refractory; salvage therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s002770050261
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mini-BEAM and ESHAP are two non-cross-resistant salvage regimens that have been used separately in patients with lymphoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of the combination of these two regimens, administered in alternating cycles, as salvage therapy for refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. A total of 28 patients were included in the study: 14 patients were primary refractory, seven were partial responders, and seven were in relapse. The alternating cycles of mini-BEAM and ESHAP were given until there was maximum response or progression. The overall response rate to mini-BEAM/ESHAP was 39%; 25% of patients achieved a complete response and 14% a partial response. Nevertheless, it should be noted that none of the primary refractory patients responded to this protocol. Nine of the 11 patients who responded to mini-BEAM/ESHAP were consolidated with autologous transplantation using BEAM as a conditioning regimen. The survival at 3 years in this group of 11 patients who responded to the salvage regimen is 64%, with a disease-free survival of 67% at 2 years. No major toxic effects were observed with mini-BEAM/ESHAP. Myelosuppression was the most frequent complication, especially with the mini-BEAM cycles. Other toxicities were infrequent and no treatment-related deaths were observed. These results suggest that alternating mini-BEAM/ESHAP chemotherapy is a safe regimen that is effective in partial responders or relapsing patients with NHL who have sensitive disease, but not in primary refractory patients. Moreover, although this therapy has a potential advantage, combining as it does two non-cross-resistant regimens, it does not seem superior to ESHAP alone.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 82
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monoclonal antibody therapy of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Tesch, H
    Engert, A
    Manzke, O
    Diehl, V
    Schnell, R
    Bohlen, H
    ONKOLOGIE, 1999, 22 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [42] Role of radiation therapy in localised non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Gospodarowicz, MK
    Tsang, R
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 1 (06): : 41 - 49
  • [43] Classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Norton, AJ
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 9 (04): : 641 - 652
  • [44] Progress in the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Yuen, AR
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 : 19 - 22
  • [45] Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2006, 7 (10) : 1293 - 1300
  • [46] Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas - Preface
    Linch, DC
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 9 (04): : R9 - R9
  • [47] Mini-BEAM is a feasible mobilization regimen in patients with Hodgkin's disease
    del Pozo, AI
    Canales, M
    Arrieta, R
    Fernandez-Jimenez, MC
    Hernandez-Garcia, MC
    Rodriguez, A
    Herraez, R
    Foncillas, MA
    Delgado, J
    Quevedo, E
    de Bustos, JG
    Hernandez-Navarro, F
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 27 : S292 - S293
  • [48] Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in breast
    Gursan, N.
    Ozmen, S.
    Sener, E.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 467 : S61 - S61
  • [49] Management of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Mounter, PJ
    Lennard, AL
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 75 (879) : 2 - 6
  • [50] Epratuzumab in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Furman R.R.
    Coleman M.
    Leonard J.P.
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2004, 5 (4) : 283 - 288