An Effort Feedback Perspective on Persuasive Decision Aids for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making

被引:0
|
作者
Frysak, Josef [1 ]
Bernroider, Edward W. N. [1 ]
Maier, Konradin
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Informat Management & Control, Welthandelspl 1,Bldg D2, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Decision aid; decision-making; cognitive decision support; multi-attribute decision-making; decision support systems; NORMATIVE FEEDBACK; SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; DSS USERS; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ACCOUNTABILITY; COMPLEX; CHOICE; INTERVENTION; HEURISTICS;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622016500486
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Decision strategies and the level of cognitive effort humans devote to decision-making are highly sensitive. This study investigates the role of feedback interventions in decision aids (DAs) to direct the user's attention and consequently increase the level of effort spent on the thinking in multi-attribute selection problems. Guided by four research hypotheses, we conducted an experiment with two groups, one with feedback enabled, the other one with it disabled, and provide post hoc click data analysis. The self-developed persuasive DA used in the experiment featured a continuous feedback mechanism based on the users investment of time. This DA led the users through a smartphone decision scenario with altering levels of complexity. Results show that normative effort feedback increases the decision maker's willingness to spend more effort. We provide new evidence supporting the view that DAs should pay more attention to soft persuasion by guiding the decision maker towards working harder rather than only confronting the user with final recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 181
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Gamified Effort Feedback Mechanism to Enhance Information Coverage in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making
    Frysak, Josef
    Bernroider, Edward W. N.
    [J]. 2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, INTELLIGENCE, SYSTEMS & APPLICATIONS (IISA), 2017, : 138 - 143
  • [2] Research on Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision-Making
    Sun, Guidong
    Guan, Xin
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS - CYBERC 2016, 2016, : 272 - 277
  • [3] PROXY APPROACH TO MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    OPPENHEIMER, KR
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1978, 24 (06) : 675 - 689
  • [4] Multi-attribute decision-making in design choice
    Bedford, T
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2391 - 2396
  • [5] Probability numbers for multi-attribute decision-making
    Weng, Shizhou
    Huang, Zhengwei
    Lv, Yuejin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2024, 46 (03) : 6109 - 6132
  • [6] Probability numbers for multi-Attribute decision-making
    Weng, Shizhou
    Huang, Zhengwei
    Lv, Yuejin
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2024, 46 (03): : 6109 - 6132
  • [7] Multi-attribute decision-making method with subjective preference
    Wang, JQ
    Liu, XJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 582 - 585
  • [8] Multi-attribute Decision-making in Economics of Fire Protection
    Vaidogas, Egidijus Rytas
    Sakenaite, Jurgita
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (03): : 262 - 270
  • [9] Multi-attribute decision-making based on the SPIFGIA operators
    Wang C.
    Fu X.
    Meng S.
    He Y.
    [J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (4) : 321 - 331
  • [10] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Ship Structural Design
    Pereira, Tiago
    Garbatov, Yordan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (08)