School districts and their local food supply chains

被引:13
|
作者
Christensen, Libby O. [1 ]
Jablonski, Becca B. R. [1 ]
O'Hara, Jeffrey K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Agr Mkt Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
关键词
Farm to school; food hubs; farm viability; intermediated sales; supply chains; FARM; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; MOVEMENT; COSTS; LEVEL; HUBS;
D O I
10.1017/S1742170517000540
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The 2015 Farm to School Census reports that during the 2013-2014 school year there were over 5200 farm to school (FTS) programs in the USA that involved 39,000 schools and 24.1 million children. These FTS programs are intended, in part, to increase market access and therefore the viability of farms and ranches. Accordingly, the majority of FTS programs involve local food procurement directly from farmers, from non-traditional suppliers that market locally branded food products such as 'food hubs', or from traditional suppliers such distributors and food service management companies. Yet, there is reason to believe that transaction costs vary based on the supply chain that schools use to procure local food. Moreover, that the supply chain that schools use to procure local food has a relationship with school's expenditures on local food. We use the 2015 Farm to School Census to estimate the relationship between school district's local food expenditures per student and supply chain structure. We analyzed data using ordinary least squares regressions, controlling for the region of the USA, the type of local food products purchased, and other school-specific characteristics. Importantly, we find a negative and significant relationship between school district's non-milk local food expenditure per student, and purchases directly from the farm and from non-traditional suppliers. This implies that schools that purchase local food from traditional distributors are likely to have higher on average expenditures per student compared with schools that purchase local food directly from farmers or non-traditional distributors. Results point to the need for additional research in determining the efficacy of policies to support direct and non-traditional FTS marketing arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transforming food supply chains for sustainability
    Gomez, Miguel I.
    Lee, Deishin
    JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 59 (04) : 79 - 92
  • [32] Knowledge management in food supply chains
    Scholz-Reiter, Bernd
    Delhourn, Salima
    Stoll, Cesar
    DYNAMICS IN LOGISTICS, 2008, : 277 - 284
  • [33] Controlling the sustainability of food supply chains
    Hamprecht, E
    Corsten, D
    Noll, M
    Meier, E
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2005, 10 (01) : 7 - 10
  • [34] Improving the design of local short food supply chains: Farmers? views in Wallonia, Belgium
    Enthoven, Laura
    Skambracks, Miriam
    Broeck, Goedele Van den
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2023, 97 : 573 - 582
  • [35] WILL EMERGING LOCAL SUPPLY CHAINS BE RESILIENT?
    Menard, Claude
    ZAGADNIENIA EKONOMIKI ROLNEJ, 2020, 364 (03): : 3 - 7
  • [36] Shorter supply chains = local reliability
    Montague, Jim
    Control, 2020, 33 (09):
  • [37] Competitiveness of Small Farms and Innovative Food Supply Chains: The Role of Food Hubs in Creating Sustainable Regional and Local Food Systems
    Berti, Giaime
    Mulligan, Catherine
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07)
  • [38] School, regulation and market: a comparison of six local school districts in Europe
    Simons, Maarten
    EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 8 (01): : 133 - 141
  • [39] Social capital and short food supply chains: Evidence from Fisheries Local Action Groups
    Freeman, Richard
    Phillipson, Jeremy
    Gorton, Matthew
    Tocco, Barbara
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2024, 64 (03) : 510 - 528
  • [40] ICT solutions to support local food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Mittal, Anuj
    Grimm, Jason
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SYSTEMS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (01) : 237 - 241