Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Rodrigues, George [1 ]
Yao, Xiaomei [2 ]
Loblaw, D. Andrew [3 ]
Brundage, Michael [4 ]
Chin, Joseph L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Oncol, London, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Program Evidence Based Care, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[5] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Div Surg Oncol, Div Urol,London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
External beam radiation therapy; Guideline recommendations; Low-dose rate brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.478
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group (GU DSG) and Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC) in Ontario, Canada developed a guideline on low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with early-stage low-grade prostate cancer in 2001. The current updated guideline focuses on the research questions regarding the effect of LDR-BT alone, the effect of LDR-BT with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and the selection of an isotope. Methods: This guideline was developed by using the methods of the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle and the core methodology was a systematic review. MEDLINE and EMBASE (from January 1996 to October 2011), the Cochrane Library, main guideline websites, and main annual meeting abstract websites specific for genitourinary diseases were searched. Internal and external reviews of the draft guideline were conducted. Results: The draft guideline was developed according to a total of 10 systematic reviews and 55 full text articles that met the pre-planned study selection criteria. The quality of evidence was low to moderate. The final report reflects integration of the feedback obtained through the internal review (two oncologists and a methodologist) and external review (five target reviewers and 48 professional consultation reviewers) process, with final approval given by the GU DSG and the PEBC. Conclusion: The main recommendations are: (1) For patients with newly diagnosed low-risk or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who require or choose active treatment, LDR-BT alone is a treatment option as an alternative to EBRT alone or RP alone; and (2) I-125 and Pd-103 are each reasonable isotope options.
引用
收藏
页码:E411 / E416
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Positive Biopsy Core Rate on Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Outcomes in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Kusuhara, Yoshito
    Fukawa, Tomoya
    Fukumori, Tomoharu
    Ueno, Yoshiteru
    Daizumoto, Kei
    Sasaki, Yutaro
    Tomida, Ryotaro
    Yamamoto, Yasuyo
    Yamaguchi, Kunihisa
    Tonoiso, Chisato
    Kubo, Akiko
    Kawanaka, Takashi
    Furutani, Shunsuke
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    Kanayama, Hiro-omi
    Takahashi, Masayuki
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (10) : 4627 - 4635
  • [22] Permanent prostate brachytherapy monotherapy with I-125 for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Outcomes in 974 patients
    Routman, David M.
    Funk, Ryan K.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    Wilson, Torrence M.
    McLaren, Robert
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    Mara, Kristin
    Deufel, Christopher L.
    Furutani, Keith M.
    Haddock, Michael G.
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Choo, C. Richard
    Davis, Brian J.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [23] Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Monotherapy With I-125 for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcome in 966 Patients
    Funk, R. K.
    Davis, B. J.
    Mynderse, L. A.
    Wilson, T. M.
    Deufel, C. L.
    Furutani, K. M.
    Pisansky, T. M.
    Haddock, M. G.
    Choo, C. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E213 - E214
  • [24] Brachytherapy guideline in prostate cancer (high and low dose rate)
    Hanna, Samir Abdallahah
    Pimentel, Leonardo
    [J]. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 63 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [25] Prospective Evaluation of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Emulating High-dose-rate Brachytherapy Dose Distribution
    Fuller, D. B.
    Mardirossian, G.
    Wong, D.
    Morris, D.
    Underhil, K.
    Medbery, C.
    Peddada, A.
    McKellar, H.
    Gray, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S149 - S149
  • [26] Biochemical Control and Toxicity Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Gogineni, Emile
    Rana, Zaker
    Soberman, Danielle
    Sidiqi, Baho
    D'Andrea, Vincent
    Lee, Lucille
    Potters, Louis
    Parashar, Bhupesh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 109 (05): : 1232 - 1242
  • [27] A comparative study of radical prostatectomy and permanent seed brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Taussky, Daniel
    Ouellet, Veronique
    Delouya, Guila
    Saad, Fred
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (7-8): : 246 - 250
  • [28] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Kishan, Amar U.
    King, Christopher R.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 268 - 278
  • [29] Low-dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate in elderly patients
    Chiumento, C.
    Fiorentino, A.
    Caivano, R.
    Clemente, S.
    Fusco, V.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (08): : 1412 - 1421
  • [30] Do androgen deprivation and the biologically equivalent dose matter in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer?
    Tabata, Ryuji
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Kuruma, Hidetoshi
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Kido, Masahito
    Miki, Kenta
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Aoki, Manabu
    Egawa, Shin
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (09): : 2314 - 2322