Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a detailed systematic analysis using published data

被引:100
|
作者
King, JE
Thatcher, N
Pickering, CAC
Hasleton, PS
机构
[1] Univ S Manchester Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
[2] Wythenshawe Hosp, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[3] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
关键词
adenocarcinoma; biopsy; immunohistochemistry; mesothelioma; pleural diseases; pleural neoplasm;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02331.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Aims: Immunohistochemistry is frequently employed to aid the distinction between mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma metastatic to the pleura, but there is uncertainty as to which antibodies are most useful. We analysed published data in order to establish sensitivity and specificity of antibodies used to distinguish between these tumours with a view to defining the most appropriate immunohistochemical panel to use when faced with this diagnostic problem. Methods and results: A systematic analysis of the results of 88 published papers comparing immunohistochemical staining of a panel of antibodies in mesothelioma with epithelioid areas, and pulmonary adenocarcinoma metastatic to the pleura. Results for a total of 15 antibodies were analysed and expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The most sensitive antibodies for identifying pulmonary adenocarcinoma were MOC-31 and BG8 (both 93%), whilst the most specific were monoclonal CEA (97%) and TTF-1 (100%). The most sensitive antibodies to identify epithelioid mesothelioma were CK5/6 (83%) and HBME-1 (85%). The most specific antibodies were CK5/6 (85%) and WT1 (96%). Conclusions: No single antibody is able to differentiate reliably between these two tumours. The use of a small panel of antibodies with a high combined sensitivity and specificity is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 232
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers in malignant mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma
    Kosjerina, Z.
    Kosjerina-Ostric, V.
    Djenadic, G.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 61 : 206 - 206
  • [2] What are the current best immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma?: A review and update
    Ordonez, Nelson G.
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 38 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [3] Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical antibodies used to distinguish between benign and malignant pleural disease: a systematic review of published reports
    King, J.
    Thatcher, N.
    Pickering, C.
    Hasleton, P.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 49 (06) : 561 - 568
  • [4] A comprehensive study of immunohistochemical markers in the distinction between pleural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma: Emphasis on sensitivity and specificity of newly defined markers
    Yaziji, H
    Battifora, H
    Bacchi, CE
    Gown, AM
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 331A - 331A
  • [5] A comprehensive study of immunohistochemical markers in the distinction between pleural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma: Emphasis on sensitivity and specificity of newly defined markers
    Yaziji, H
    Battifora, H
    Bacchi, CE
    Gown, AM
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 331A - 331A
  • [6] Combined staining for immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Improvement in the sensitivity or specificity?
    Wu, Gang
    Wang, Jie
    Zhou, Zhongwen
    Li, Tianyi
    Tang, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (04) : 975 - 983
  • [7] Evaluation of 12 antibodies for distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma: identification of a three-antibody immunohistochemical panel with maximal sensitivity and specificity
    Yaziji, H
    Battifora, H
    Barry, TS
    Hwang, HC
    Bacchi, CE
    McIntosh, MW
    Kussick, SJ
    Gown, AM
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 (04) : 514 - 523
  • [8] A study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of hospital discharge diagnosis data used in the MICA study
    McAlpine, R
    Pringle, S
    Pringle, T
    Lorimer, R
    MacDonald, TM
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 1998, 7 (05) : 311 - 318
  • [9] Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of MicroRNA in the Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rabiee, Fatemeh
    Kahrizsangi, Fatemeh Salehi
    Mehralizadeh, Neda
    Jamali, Somaye
    [J]. MEDICINA BALEAR, 2023, 38 (06):
  • [10] Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yan
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhen, Yanhua
    Li, Huixia
    [J]. MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2018, 20 (01) : 32 - 36