Heavy metal removal in duckweed and algae ponds as a polishing step for textile wastewater treatment

被引:114
|
作者
Sekomo, Christian B. [1 ,2 ]
Rousseau, Diederik P. L. [1 ,3 ]
Saleh, Saleh A. [1 ]
Lens, Piet N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, Dept Environm Resources, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Natl Univ Rwanda, Dept Chem, Butare, Rwanda
[3] Howest Univ Coll W Flanders, Res Grp Enbichem, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
Algae; Duckweed; Textile wastewater; Heavy metals; Tracer test; ACID-MINE DRAINAGE; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; TRACE-ELEMENTS; TOXICITY; CADMIUM; TOLERANCE; COPPER; PLANTS; ZINC; PHYTOREMEDIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Untreated textile wastewater is a typical source of heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems. In this study, the use of algae and duckweed ponds as post-treatment for textile wastewater has been evaluated under the hypothesis that differing conditions such as pH, redox potential and dissolved oxygen in these ponds would lead to different heavy metal removal efficiencies. Two lab-scale systems each consisting of three ponds in series and seeded with algae (natural colonisation) and duckweed (Lemna minor), respectively, have been operated at a hydraulic retention time of 7 days and under two different metal loading rates and light regimes (16/8 h light/darkness and 24 h light). Cr removal rates were 94% for the duckweed ponds and 98% for the algal ponds, indifferently of the metal loading rate and light regime. No effect of pond type could be demonstrated for Zn removal. Under the 16/8 light regime, Zn removal proceeded well (similar to 70%) at a low metal loading rate, but dropped to below 40% at the higher metal loading rate. The removal efficiency raised back to 80% at the higher metal loading rate but under 24 h light regime. Pb, Cd and Cu all showed relatively similar patterns with removal efficiencies of 36% and 33% for Pb, 33% and 21% for Cd and 27% and 29% for Cu in the duckweed and the algal ponds, respectively. This indicates that both treatment systems are not very suitable as a polishing step for removing these heavy metals. Despite the significant differences in terms of physico-chemical conditions, differences in metal removal efficiency between algal and duckweed ponds were rather small. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Algae-biological Treatment of Wastewater of Heavy Oil
    He, Feng
    Zhou, Hua
    2015 2ND ASIAN PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (APEESD 2015), 2015, : 240 - 242
  • [32] The use of duckweed for removal of heavy metals and organic compounds from wastewater in As-Samra
    Sweidan, Kamal A.
    Fayyad, Manar K.
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2006, 15 (05): : 354 - 359
  • [33] Navigating heavy metal removal: Insights into advanced treatment technologies for wastewater: A review
    Abdullayev, Eldar
    Vakili, Amir Hossein
    Amr, Salem S. Abu
    Alazaiza, Motasem Y. D.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (06):
  • [34] A Review on Heavy Metal Ions and Containing Dyes Removal Through Graphene Oxide-Based Adsorption Strategies for Textile Wastewater Treatment
    Velusamy, Sasireka
    Roy, Anurag
    Sundaram, Senthilarasu
    Kumar Mallick, Tapas
    CHEMICAL RECORD, 2021, 21 (07): : 1570 - 1610
  • [35] Application of Algal Nanotechnology for Leather Wastewater Treatment and Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency
    Khilji, Sheza Ayaz
    Munir, Neelma
    Aziz, Irfan
    Anwar, Bareera
    Hasnain, Maria
    Jakhar, Ali Murad
    Sajid, Zahoor A.
    Abideen, Zainul
    Hussain, Muhammad Iftikhar
    El-Habeeb, Abeer A.
    Yang, Hsi-Hsien
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [36] Nutrient Removal by Algae-Based Wastewater Treatment
    Nguyen, Luong N.
    Aditya, Lisa
    Vu, Hang P.
    Johir, Abu Hasan
    Bennar, Lucia
    Ralph, Peter
    Hoang, Ngoc B.
    Zdarta, Jakub
    Nghiem, Long D.
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2022, 8 (04) : 369 - 383
  • [37] Nutrient Removal by Algae-Based Wastewater Treatment
    Luong N. Nguyen
    Lisa Aditya
    Hang P. Vu
    Abu Hasan Johir
    Lucia Bennar
    Peter Ralph
    Ngoc B. Hoang
    Jakub Zdarta
    Long D. Nghiem
    Current Pollution Reports, 2022, 8 : 369 - 383
  • [38] Algae as a green technology for heavy metals removal from various wastewater
    Salama, El-Sayed
    Roh, Hyun-Seog
    Dev, Subhabrata
    Khan, Moonis Ali
    Abou-Shanab, Reda A., I
    Chang, Soon Woong
    Jeon, Byong-Hun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 35 (05):
  • [39] Algae as a green technology for heavy metals removal from various wastewater
    El-Sayed Salama
    Hyun-Seog Roh
    Subhabrata Dev
    Moonis Ali Khan
    Reda A. I. Abou-Shanab
    Soon Woong Chang
    Byong-Hun Jeon
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 35
  • [40] Nutrient removal by duckweed from anaerobically treated swine wastewater in lab-scale stabilization ponds in Vietnam
    Thi To Uyen Dinh
    Soda, Satoshi
    Thi An Hang Nguyen
    Nakajima, Jun
    The Ha Cao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 722