Swept path analyses using unmanned aerial system (UAS)

被引:0
|
作者
Bogdan, Kornelija [1 ]
Barisic, Ivana [2 ]
Moser, Vladimir [2 ]
Rajle, Damir [3 ]
机构
[1] RENCON Doo, Ribarska 1, Osijek 31000, Croatia
[2] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture Osijek, Dept Geotech Transportat Engn & Geodesy, Vladimira Preloga 3, Osijek 31000, Croatia
[3] Vocat Sch Construct & Geodesy Osijek, Drinska 16a, Osijek 31000, Croatia
来源
关键词
UAS; swept path; traffic area design; vehicle trajectories;
D O I
10.13167/2022.25.3
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125 degrees for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125 degrees turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125 degrees turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BI-BAND FRESNEL REFLECTARRAY FOR UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS)-SATELLITE COMMUNICATION
    Ba, O.
    Lanteri, J.
    Migliaccio, C.
    Menzel, W.
    MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 58 (05) : 1025 - 1028
  • [42] Review of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) applications in the built environment: Towards automated building inspection procedures using drones
    Rakha, Tarek
    Gorodetsky, Alice
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 93 : 252 - 264
  • [43] Time Optimization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using an Augmented Path
    Md, Abdul Quadir
    Agrawal, Divyank
    Mehta, Monark
    Sivaraman, Arun Kumar
    Tee, Kong Fah
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2021, 13 (12):
  • [44] Entropic skill assessment of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operators
    Schnell, T.
    Engler, J.
    JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2014, 2 (02): : 53 - 68
  • [45] AMRDEC LETHALITY MODELING DEVELOPMENT FOR UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS)
    Clark, D.
    Deerman, B.
    Olson, A.
    Moore, D.
    27TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BALLISTICS, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2013, : 528 - 535
  • [46] WETLAND HYDROLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT WITH UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS)
    Boon, M. A.
    Tesfamichael, S.
    37TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 42-3 (W2): : 31 - 35
  • [47] Height estimation of sugarcane using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) based on structure from motion (SfM) point clouds
    Wachholz De Souza, Carlos Henrique
    Camargo Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto
    Rocha, Jansle Vieira
    Graziano Magalhaes, Paulo Sergio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (8-10) : 2218 - 2230
  • [48] Planning Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Takeoff Trajectories to Minimize Third-party Risk
    Rudnick-Cohen, Eliot
    Azarm, Shapour
    Herrmann, Jeffrey W.
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS' 19), 2019, : 1306 - 1315
  • [49] A quadcopter unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based methodology for measuring biomass burning emission factors
    Vernooij, Roland
    Winiger, Patrik
    Wooster, Martin
    Strydom, Tercia
    Poulain, Laurent
    Dusek, Ulrike
    Grosvenor, Mark
    Roberts, Gareth J.
    Schutgens, Nick
    van der Werf, Guido R.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2022, 15 (14) : 4271 - 4294
  • [50] Cybersecurity of the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
    Pyzynski, M.
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS'20), 2020, : 1265 - 1269