The multidisciplinary hemodialysis patient satisfaction scale: Reliability, validity, and scale development

被引:4
|
作者
Martin, PD [1 ]
Brantley, PJ [1 ]
McKnight, GT [1 ]
Jones, GN [1 ]
Springer, A [1 ]
机构
[1] LOUISIANA STATE UNIV,MED CTR,BATON ROUGE,LA 70803
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107319119700400113
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Patient satisfaction is frequently used to evaluate service quality. Although this is a common construct, satisfaction scale development has often overlooked the importance of psychometric properties and the uniqueness of patient experiences. Although there is a substantial body of literature investigating satisfaction with general patient services and physicians, development in the areas of multidisciplinary team assessment, specific patient populations, and minority groups is needed. To date, only one hemodialysis patient satisfaction scale with attention to psychometric properties appears to be available. However, this instrument does not assess satisfaction with the roles of the full hemodialysis treatment team. The present study reports the development and preliminary reliability and validity studies of the Multidisciplinary Hemodialysis Patient Satisfaction Scale (MHPSS). This 110-item Likert scale assesses the degree of satisfaction with the health care services of a multidisciplinary hemodialysis team. Methods used to construct the subscales, measuring different dimensions of service, include item analyses and principal components factor analysis. Matched-pair items were included and partialled out of a correlation matrix to control for inconsistent responding or for possible response biases. Results indicate that the MHPSS is psychometrically sound and may be a useful tool for assessment of patient satisfaction and continuous quality assessment of hemodialysis services.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Latino/a Values Scale Development, Reliability, and Validity
    Kim, Bryan S. K.
    Soliz, Alicia
    Orellana, Blanca
    Alamilla, Saul G.
    MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 42 (02) : 71 - 91
  • [22] Family Resilience Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity
    Kaner, Sema
    Bayrakli, Hatice
    ANKARA UNIVERSITESI EGITIM BILIMLERI FAKULTESI OZEL EGITIM DERGISI-ANKARA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2010, 11 (02) : 47 - 66
  • [23] Development, Reliability, and Validity of a Scale of Awareness of Procrastination
    Kohama, Shun
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 58 (03): : 325 - 337
  • [24] Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity
    Gunuc, Selim
    Kuzu, Abdullah
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (04) : 587 - 610
  • [25] Development of the Critically Ill Patient Eye Assessment Scale: A study of validity and reliability
    Kahraman, Burcu Bayrak
    Acun, Aysun
    Ozturk, Elif Sozeri
    Kirca, Kamile
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 30 (02)
  • [26] Reliability and validity of the Kansas martial satisfaction scale for Chinese parents
    Shek, DTL
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 83 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [27] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women
    Abali Cetin S.
    Aslan E.
    Sexuality & Culture, 2018, 22 (3) : 881 - 893
  • [28] The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Duke anticoagulation satisfaction scale
    Yildirim, Julide Gulizar
    Temel, Ayla Bayik
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 22 (04): : 761 - 772
  • [29] Development, reliability and validity of the Nurses' Ethical Behaviours for Protecting Patient Rights Scale
    Eyuboglu, Gulcan
    Eyikara, Evrim
    Baykara, Zehra Gocmen
    Gul, Senay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [30] Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale: reliability and validity study in Turkish
    Toksoy, Safak Ebru
    Cerit, Cem
    Aker, Ahmet Tamer
    Zvelc, Gregor
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 21 : 37 - 44