Phalloplasty and urethroplasty in a boy with penile agenesis

被引:5
|
作者
De Castro, Roberto [1 ]
Rondon, Atila [2 ]
Barroso, Ubirajara, Jr. [3 ]
Ortiz, Valdemar [2 ]
Macedo, Antonio, Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp CdC Petrucciani, Lecce, Italy
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Div Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Bahia, Div Urol, BR-41170290 Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Penile agenesis; Penis; Male; Phalloplasty; Aphallia; MANAGEMENT; APHALLIA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.09.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: New concepts in ambiguous genitalia have questioned the strategy of female gender reassignment in cases of penile agenesis. Hence, we present a video of the construction of a phallus according to the De Castro technique as an alternative approach for this devastating condition. Methods: A 12-year-old boy with congenital penile agenesis and posterior urethra emerging in the distal rectum was selected. An ASTRA approach was used and a phallus was constructed with a skin flap from the abdominal wall, tubularized to produce a phallic appearance. A buccal mucosa graft was tubularized to create the new urethra. Results: Immediate outcome was excellent. Partial dehiscence of the dorsal urethral sutures occurred and the patient started voiding through a scrotal urethrostomy at 9 months postoperatively. Phalloplasty provided an adequate male appearance with a good cosmetic aspect. Conclusion: The technique is a feasible alternative. A procedure in 2 stages by first creating the neourethra at a later date might be an interesting option to try to avoid the urethral complications observed. Long-term follow-up is however necessary to confirm the initial results. (c) 2012 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108.e1 / 108.e2
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PENILE PROSTHESIS INSERTION FOLLOWING COMPLEX URETHROPLASTY
    Garaffa, G.
    Raheem, A.
    Minhas, A.
    Christopher, A. N.
    Ralph, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 : 192 - 192
  • [42] An unusual complication of penile prosthesis following urethroplasty
    Kardar, AH
    Aslam, M
    Lindstedt, E
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 36 (01): : 89 - 90
  • [43] Penile Complications After Urethroplasty: Who Cares?
    Riechardt, Silke
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 (04) : 383 - 384
  • [44] Penile prosthesis insertion following complex urethroplasty
    Garaffa, G.
    Andrich, D.
    Minhas, S.
    Mundy, A. R.
    Christopher, N. A.
    Ralph, D. J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (01) : 40 - 40
  • [45] PHALLOPLASTY FOLLOWED BY PENILE PROSTHESIS INSERTION IN FEMALE TO MALE TRANSSEXUALS
    Stojanovic, Borko
    Bizic, Marta
    Kojovic, Vladimir
    Pusica, Slavica
    Bencic, Marko
    Djordjevic, Miroslav
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E36 - E36
  • [46] SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH ZSI FTM PENILE IMPLANTS FOR PHALLOPLASTY
    Pigot, Garry
    van Leeuwen, Joost
    de Rooij, Freek
    Ronkes, Brechje
    van der Sluis, Wouter
    Bouman, Mark Bram
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E908 - E908
  • [47] Scrotal flap phalloplasty as temporary neophallus in infants and children with penile agenesis: Multi-institutional experience and long-term follow-up
    Cezarino, Bruno Nicolino
    Arceo, Ricardo
    Leslie, Jeffrey A.
    Koyle, Martin
    Denes, Francisco Tibor
    Prieto, Juan Carlos
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (01) : 53.e1 - 53.e6
  • [48] Dorsal phalloplasty accompanying penile prosthesis implantation minimizes penile shortening and improves patient satisfaction
    Osama Shaeer
    Kamal Shaeer
    Islam Fathy Soliman AbdelRahman
    Amr Raheem
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2019, 31 : 276 - 281
  • [49] Neo-phalloplasty in children and adolescents for acquired penile loss
    De Castro, Roberto
    Iaquinto, Marianna
    Caldamone, Anthony A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (01) : 566.e1 - 566.e12
  • [50] Phalloplasty: A valuable treatment for males with penile insufficiency - Editorial comment
    Redett, Richard
    UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (02) : 276 - 277