Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia Position: A New Standard for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

被引:227
|
作者
Scoffone, Cesare M. [1 ]
Cracco, Cecilia M. [1 ]
Cossu, Marco [1 ]
Grande, Susanna [1 ]
Poggio, Massimiliano [1 ]
Scarpa, Roberto M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Hosp, Dept Urol, Turin, Italy
关键词
Kidney stones; Nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous; RIRS; Supine; Ureteroscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), the gold standard for the management of large and/or complex urolithiasis, is conventionally performed with the patient in the prone position, which has several drawbacks. of the various changes in patient positioning proposed over the years, the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position seems the most beneficial. It allows simultaneous performance of PCNL and retrograde ureteroscopy (ECIRS, Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery) and has unquestionable anaesthesiological advantages. Objective: To prospectively analyse the safety and efficacy of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in GMSV position for the treatment of large and/or complex urolithiasis. Design, setting, and participants: From April 2004 to December 2007, 127 consecutive patients who were followed in our department for large and/or complex urolithiasis were selected for surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score 1-3, no active urinary tract infection [UTI], any body mass index [BMI]). Intervention: All the patients underwent ECIRS in GMSV position. Technical choices about percutaneous access, endoscopic instruments and accessories, and postoperative renal and ureteral drainage are detailed. Measurements: Patients' mean age plus or minus standard deviation (+/-SD) was 53.1 yr +/- 14.2. Of the 127 patients, 5.5% had congenital renal abnormalities, 3.9% had solitary kidneys, and 60.6% were symptomatic for renal colics, haematuria, and recurrent UTI. Mean stone size +/- SD was 23.8 mm +/- 7.3 (range: 11-40); 33.8% of the calculi were calyceal, 33.1% were pelvic, 33.1% were multiple or staghorn, and 4.7% were also ureteral. Results and limitations: Mean operative time +/- SD was 70 min +/- 28, including patient positioning. Stone-free rate was 81.9% after the first treatment and was 87.4% after a second early treatment using the same percutaneous access during the same hospital stay (mean SD: 5.1 d +/- 2.9). We registered overall complications at 38.6% with no splanchnic injuries or deaths and no perioperative anaesthesiological problems. Conclusions: ECIRS performed in GMSV position seems to be a safe, effective, and versatile procedure with a high one-step stone-free rate, unquestionable anaesthesiological advantages, and no additional procedure -related complications. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1403
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery (ECIRS) for the treatment of complex urological pathologies using Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position
    Scoffone, C.
    Morra, I.
    Cracco, C.
    Ragni, F.
    Poggio, M.
    Cossu, M.
    Vaccino, D.
    Billia, M.
    Grande, S.
    Scarpa, R. M.
    Ibarluzea, G.
    Valdivia, Uria J. G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 335 - 335
  • [22] Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy: An Assessment of Costs for Prone and Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia Positioning
    Friedlander, Justin I.
    Duty, Brian D.
    Smith, Arthur D.
    Okeke, Zeph
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (04) : 771 - 775
  • [23] Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
    Ahmed Emam
    Mohamed Elmoazen
    Mohamed Shabayek
    Amr M. Zriek
    Hany Hamed Gad
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2022, 54 : 463 - 468
  • [24] Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
    Emam, Ahmed
    Elmoazen, Mohamed
    Shabayek, Mohamed
    Zriek, Amr M.
    Gad, Hany Hamed
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (03) : 463 - 468
  • [25] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Update, Trends, and Future Directions for Simultaneous Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Ureterolithotripsy in the Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia Position for Large Proximal Ureteral Calculi (vol 71, pg 837, 2017)
    Huang, Tsung-Yi
    Feng, Kathy Ming
    Lo, Ing-Shiang
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : E148 - E148
  • [26] A Comparative Study of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine Position and Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery With Flexible Instrument
    Nuno de la Rosa, I.
    Palmero, J. L.
    Miralles, J.
    Pastor, J. C.
    Benedicto, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (01): : 14 - 20
  • [27] Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: A multi-institutional analysis
    Hamamoto, Shuzo
    Okada, Shinsuke
    Inoue, Takaaki
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Kawase, Kengo
    Okada, Tomoki
    Chaya, Ryosuke
    Hattori, Tatsuya
    Okada, Atsushi
    Matsuda, Tadashi
    Yasui, Takahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1129 - 1135
  • [28] GALDAKAO-MODIFIED SUPINE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: INITIAL EXPERIENCE OVER A 1-YEAR PERIOD
    Cavadas, Vitor
    Branco, Frederico
    Osorio, Luis
    Teves, Frederico
    Fraga, Avelino
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A31 - A31
  • [29] THE ADVANTAGES OF THE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN SUPINE POSITION (THE VALDIVIA TECHNIQUE). PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
    Bucuras, V.
    Bardan, R.
    Muresan, A.
    Balarie, C.
    Comsa, C.
    Georgiadis, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A79 - A79
  • [30] Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Desoky, Esam A. E.
    Allam, Mohammed N.
    Ammar, Mostafa K.
    Abdelwahab, Khaled M.
    Elsaid, Diab A.
    Fawzi, Amr M.
    Alayman, Ahmed A.
    Shahin, Ashraf M. S.
    Kamel, Hussein M.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 10 (02) : 143 - 148