THE INFLUENCE OF FEEDSTOCK TYPE AND OPERATING PARAMETERS ON TAR FORMATION IN THE PROCESS OF GASIFICATION AND CO-GASIFICATION

被引:5
|
作者
Kaminska-Pietrzak, Natalia [1 ]
Howaniec, Natalia [2 ]
Smolinski, Adam [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Min Inst, Interdisciplinary PhD Studies Clean Coal Technol, PL-40166 Katowice, Poland
[2] Cent Min Inst, Dept Energy Saving & Air Protect, PL-40166 Katowice, Poland
关键词
tar; gasification; co-gasification; biomass; waste; coal; FLUIDIZED-BED GASIFICATION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; STEAM GASIFICATION; REMOVAL CATALYST; WOODY BIOMASS; PRODUCER GAS; PYROLYSIS; AIR; OLIVINE; DOLOMITE;
D O I
10.2478/eces-2013-0052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing energy demand, limited resources of fossil fuels and environmental aspects are the main rationales of the research efforts aiming at wider utilization of renewable resources and waste in energy generation systems. Gasification technologies are based on thermochemical processing of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels to gas of the composition dependent on kind of gasification agent and operating parameters used. The range of applications of the product gas includes basically chemical and petrochemical industries. Its utilization in power generation systems is also of industrial interest since the environmental impact of gasification technologies is lower and the process efficiency is higher than of coal-fired power plants and it enables to utilize wide range of fuels, including fossil fuels, biomass, industrial waste and various fuel blends. One of the most important operational issues related with thermochemical processing of biomass and waste is the formation of tars, which reduces the energy efficiency of the process and causes technical problems in a system operation. The amount and quality of tars depends on the chemical composition of a fuel, a gasification agent used and its ratio to fuel flow, process temperature and pressure as well as the construction of a gasifier. In the paper review of the research on the influence of operating parameters and kind of feedstock on tar formation and composition in the process of gasification and co-gasification is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 761
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Process Simulation of the Co-Gasification of Wood and Polymeric Materials in a Fixed Bed
    I. G. Donskoi
    Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2018, 52 : 121 - 127
  • [42] Assessment of sewage sludge as a component for the tire char co-gasification process
    Spiewak, K.
    Czerski, G.
    Grzywacz, P.
    Makowska, D.
    ENERGY, 2024, 308
  • [43] Influence of blending methods on the co-gasification reactivity of petroleum coke and lignite
    Zhan, Xiuli
    Jia, Jia
    Zhou, Zhijie
    Wang, Fuchen
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (04) : 1810 - 1814
  • [44] Co-gasification Reactivity of Coal and Woody Biomass in High-Temperature Gasification
    Kajitani, Shiro
    Zhang, Yan
    Umemoto, Satoshi
    Ashizawa, Masami
    Hara, Saburo
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (01) : 145 - 151
  • [45] A brief review of CO2 utilization for alkali carbonate gasification and biomass/coal co-gasification: Reactivity, products and process
    Abdalazeez, Atif
    Li, Tianle
    Wang, Wenju
    Abuelgasim, Siddig
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2021, 43
  • [46] Influence of the Gasification Agent Type on Syngas Parameters
    Werle, Sebastian
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2014, 16 : 440 - 452
  • [47] Co-Gasification Mechanism and Kinetics of Petcoke with Lignite
    Ren, Liwei
    Wei, Ruidi
    Xin, Jing
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (02) : 1688 - 1697
  • [48] Co-Gasification of Oil Sand Coke with Coal
    Vejahati, Farshid
    Gupta, Rajender
    CLEANER COMBUSTION AND SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2012, : 608 - 612
  • [49] Co-gasification of petroleum coke and straw char
    Liu, Xin
    Zhang, Bao-Shen
    Chen, Xue-Li
    Zhou, Zhi-Jie
    Wang, Fu-Chen
    Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao/Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2012, 40 (02): : 164 - 169
  • [50] Co-gasification of sewage sludge and Virginia Mallow
    Szwaja, Stanislaw
    Poskart, Anna
    Zajemska, Monika
    Szwaja, Magdalena
    Chwist, Mariusz
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2019, 98 (02): : 278 - 282