Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements between Scheimpflug Photography and Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry in Children

被引:4
|
作者
Hashemi, Hassan [1 ]
Nabovati, Payam [2 ]
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi [3 ]
Emamian, Mohammad Hassan [4 ]
Yekta, Abbasali [5 ]
Fotouhi, Akbar [6 ]
机构
[1] Noor Eye Hosp, Noor Res Ctr Ophthalm Epidemiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr, Sch Rehabil Sci, Dept Optometry, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ophthalm Epidemiol Res Ctr, Shahroud, Iran
[5] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Refract Errors Res Ctr, Sch Paramed Sci, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Corneal thickness; corneal imaging; agreement; children; Iran; ULTRASOUND PACHYMETRY; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; PENTACAM; TOMOGRAPHY; LENSTAR; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1080/08820538.2020.1810288
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Central corneal thickness (CCT) is a key indicator of the corneal health status and is therefore of clinical importance. The aim of the present study was to determine the agreement between Scheimpflug photography (SP) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) systems in measuring the CCT in children. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the samples were selected from Shahroud schoolchildren using cluster sampling. The samples then underwent optometric examinations, including the measurement of visual acuity and refraction. CCT measurements were done by the SP and OLCR systems between 8 am and 4 pm. To evaluate the agreement between these devices, 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were reported. Results After applying the exclusion criteria, 4890 right eyes (53.2% male) were analyzed. The mean age of the students was 9.22 +/- 1.72 years (range: 6-12 years). The mean CCT by the SP and OLCR systems was 555.30 +/- 34.15 and 550.23 +/- 35.11 mu m, respectively. The 95% LoA between the two devices was -19.81 to 9.66 mu m, and the ICC was 0.983. The CCT difference between the SP and OLCR systems was 5.61 mu m in boys and 3.36 mu m in girls. The CCT difference between the two devices was 6.41 mu m in 6-year-old and 3.54 mu m in 12-year-old children. The 95% LoA was -17.96 to 9.58 mu m and -18.89 to 8.47 mu m and the ICC was 0.987 and 0.984 in myopic and hyperopic subjects, respectively. Conclusion The results of this study showed a high agreement between OLCR and SP measurements of CCT in children.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 256
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera
    Gonul, Saban
    Koktekir, Bengu Ekinci
    Bakbak, Berker
    Gedik, Sansal
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2014, 77 (06) : 345 - 350
  • [2] Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry
    Barkana, Y
    Gerber, Y
    Elbaz, U
    Schwartz, S
    Ken-Dror, G
    Avni, I
    Zadok, D
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (09): : 1729 - 1735
  • [3] Evaluating central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometry and contact ultrasound pachymetry
    Airiani, Suzanna
    Trokel, Stephen L.
    Lee, Shing M.
    Braunstein, Richard E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (01) : 164 - 165
  • [4] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera, a Specular Microscope, Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Keratoconic Eyes
    Cinar, Yasin
    Cingu, Abdullah Kursat
    Turkcu, Fatih Mehmet
    Cinar, Tuba
    Sahin, Alparslan
    Yuksel, Harun
    Ari, Seyhmus
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 30 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [5] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements With Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Ultrasound Pachymetry and Reproducibility of Both Devices
    Koktekir, Bengu E.
    Gedik, Sansal
    Bakbak, Berker
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (11) : 1278 - 1281
  • [6] Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: Repeatability and agreement
    Chen, Wuhe
    McAlinden, Colm
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Wang, Qinmei
    Lu, Fan
    Feng, Yifan
    Chen, Jie
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (09): : 1626 - 1632
  • [7] Precision and reproducibility of measurements of human corneal thickness with rapid optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)
    Böhnke, M
    Masters, BR
    Wälti, R
    Ballif, JJ
    Chavanne, P
    Gianotti, R
    Salathé, RP
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 1999, 4 (01) : 152 - 156
  • [8] Comparison of central corneal thickness using optical low-coherence reflectometry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
    Lopez-Miguel, Alberto
    Encarnacion Correa-Perez, Maria
    Miranda-Anta, Silvia
    Iglesias-Cortinas, Dario
    Begona Coco-Martin, Maria
    Maldonado, Miguel J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (05): : 758 - 764
  • [9] Assessment of central corneal thickness using OCT, ultrasound, optical low coherence reflectometry and Scheimpflug pachymetry
    Beutelspacher, Sven C.
    Serbecic, Nermin
    Scheuerle, Alexander F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 132 - 137
  • [10] Comparison of anterior segment measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and rotating dual Scheimpflug analysis
    Huerva, Valentin
    Ascaso, Francisco J.
    Soldevila, Jordi
    Lavilla, Laura
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 40 (07): : 1170 - 1176