Selective and distributed attention in human and pigeon category learning

被引:10
|
作者
Castro, Leyre [1 ]
Savic, Olivera [2 ]
Navarro, Victor [1 ]
Sloutsky, Vladimir M. [2 ]
Wasserman, Edward A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Categorization; Attention; Cognitive development; Animal cognition; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE CONTROL; COLUMBA-LIVIA; HOMO-SAPIENS; CATEGORIZATION; MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; STIMULI; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104350
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Attention to relevant stimulus features in a categorization task helps to optimize performance. However, the relationship between attention and categorization is not fully understood. For example, even when human adults and young children exhibit comparable categorization behavior, adults tend to attend selectively during learning, whereas young children tend to attend diffusely (Deng & Sloutsky, 2016). Here, we used a comparative approach to investigate the link between attention and categorization in two different species. Given the noteworthy categorization ability of avian species, we compared the attentional profiles of pigeons and human adults. We gave human adults (Experiment 1) and pigeons (Experiment 2) a categorization task that could be learned on the basis of either one deterministic feature (encouraging selective attention) or multiple probabilistic features (encouraging distributed attention). Both humans and pigeons relied on the deterministic feature to categorize the stimuli, albeit humans did so to a much greater degree. Furthermore, computational modeling revealed that most of the adults exhibited maximal selectivity, whereas pigeons tended to distribute their attention among several features. Our findings indicate that human adults focus their attention on deterministic information and filter less predictive information, but pigeons do not. Implications for the underlying brain mechanisms of attention and categorization are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SELECTIVE ATTENTION AND STIMULUS-REINFORCER INTERACTIONS IN THE PIGEON
    KELLEY, MJ
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 38 (01): : 97 - 110
  • [22] Selective Attention in Human Associative Learning and Recognition Memory
    Griffiths, Oren
    Mitchell, Chris J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2008, 137 (04) : 626 - 648
  • [23] SELECTIVE ATTENTION AND LEARNING
    Schwartzstein, Joshua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2014, 12 (06) : 1423 - 1452
  • [24] Human category learning
    Ashby, EG
    Maddox, WT
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 56 : 149 - 178
  • [25] Learning and selective attention
    Dayan, Peter
    Kakade, Sham
    Montague, P. Read
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (11) : 1218 - 1223
  • [26] Learning and selective attention
    Peter Dayan
    Sham Kakade
    P. Read Montague
    [J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2000, 3 : 1218 - 1223
  • [27] Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning
    Rehder, B
    Hoffman, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (05) : 811 - 829
  • [28] Category structure and region-specific selective attention
    Nosofsky, Robert M.
    Hu, Mingjia
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2023, 51 (04) : 915 - 929
  • [29] Attention to Speech: Mapping Distributed and Selective Attention Systems
    Agmon, Galit
    Yahav, Paz Har-Shai
    Ben-Shachar, Michal
    Golumbic, Elana Zion
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2021, : 3763 - 3776
  • [30] Ambiguity produces attention shifts in category learning
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    Orgaz, Cristina
    Luque, David
    Byron Nelson, James
    [J]. LEARNING & MEMORY, 2016, 23 (04) : 134 - 140