Cross-borehole flowmeter tests for transient heads in heterogeneous aquifers

被引:33
|
作者
Le Borgne, T
Paillet, F
Bour, O
Caudal, JP
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Rennes, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00150.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Cross-borehole flowmeter tests have been proposed as an efficient method to investigate preferential flowpaths in heterogeneous aquifers, which is a major task in the characterization of fractured aquifers. Cross-borehole flowmeter tests are based on the idea that changing the pumping conditions in a given aquifer will modify the hydraulic head distribution in large-scale flowpaths, producing measurable changes in the vertical flow profiles in observation boreholes. However, inversion of flow measurements to derive flowpath geometry and connectivity and to characterize their hydraulic properties is still a subject of research. In this study, we propose a framework for cross-borehole flowmeter test interpretation that is based on a two-scale conceptual model: discrete fractures at the borehole scale and zones of interconnected fractures at the aquifer scale. We propose that the two problems may be solved independently. The first inverse problem consists of estimating the hydraulic head variations that drive the transient borehole flow observed in the cross-borehole flowmeter experiments. The second inverse problem is related to estimating the geometry and hydraulic properties of large-scale flowpaths in the region between pumping and observation wells that are compatible with the head variations deduced from the first problem. To solve the borehole-scale problem, we treat the transient flow data as a series of quasi-steady flow conditions and solve for the hydraulic head changes in individual fractures required to produce these data. The consistency of the method is verified using field experiments performed in a fractured-rock aquifer.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 452
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design and implementation of resistive grout for cross-borehole electrical imaging
    Thomle, Jonathan
    Peta, Kelsey
    Zhong, Lirong
    Robinson, Judy
    Johnson, Tim
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 236
  • [42] Detection of local inhomogeneities by means of cross-borehole seismic tomography
    Ditmar, PG
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1997, 150 (02) : 269 - 284
  • [43] The Simulation and Imaging of Cross-borehole Elastic Wave for Boulders Detection
    Liu, Jiangping
    Mao, Mao
    Xu, Hao
    Li, Zhaofeng
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, 2012, : 240 - 246
  • [44] Preferential Pathways Inversion From Cross-Borehole Electrical Data
    Lelimouzin, Lea
    Champollion, Cedric
    Levy, Lea
    Roubinet, Delphine
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (21)
  • [45] An efficient cross-borehole direct current resistivity monitoring instrument
    Liu, Lichao
    Gonzalez, Diego Domenzain
    Vela, Ivan
    Maurya, Pradip Kumar
    Kuhl, Anders K.
    Bording, Thue
    Ejlskov, Palle
    Auken, Esben
    Larsen, Jakob Juul
    Christiansen, Anders Vest
    GEOPHYSICS, 2025, 90 (02) : D61 - D70
  • [46] Borehole Flowmeter Logging for the Accurate Design and Analysis of Tracer Tests
    Basirico, Stefano
    Crosta, Giovanni B.
    Frattini, Paolo
    Villa, Alberto
    Godio, Alberto
    GROUNDWATER, 2015, 53 : 3 - 9
  • [47] CROSS-BOREHOLE TEM FOR ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY - A MODEL STUDY
    LABRECQUE, DJ
    GEOEXPLORATION, 1991, 28 (3-4): : 329 - 348
  • [48] CROSS-BOREHOLE ELECTROMAGNETIC PROBING TO LOCATE HIGH-CONTRAST ANOMALIES
    LYTLE, RJ
    LAINE, EF
    LAGER, DL
    DAVIS, DT
    GEOPHYSICS, 1979, 44 (10) : 1667 - 1676
  • [49] Detection of Deeply Located Dormant Tunnel Using Cross-Borehole Radar
    Kim, Se-Yun
    2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (ISAP), 2018,
  • [50] Phase correction of electromagnetic coupling effects in cross-borehole EIT measurements
    Zhao, Y.
    Zimmermann, E.
    Huisman, J. A.
    Treichel, A.
    Wolters, B.
    van Waasen, S.
    Kemna, A.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (01)