Is low-molecular-weight heparin safe for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury? A Western Trauma Association multicenter study

被引:54
|
作者
Kwiatt, Michael E. [1 ]
Patel, Mitul S. [1 ]
Ross, Steven E. [1 ]
Lachant, Mary T. [1 ]
MacNew, Heather G. [3 ]
Ochsner, M. Gage [3 ]
Norwood, Scott H. [4 ]
Speier, LaDonna [4 ]
Kozar, Rosemary [5 ]
Gerber, Jonathan A. [5 ]
Rowell, Susan [6 ]
Krishnakumar, Sheetal [6 ]
Livingston, David H. [2 ]
Manis, George [2 ]
Haan, James M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Cooper Univ Hosp, Off Surg Educ, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Univ Hosp, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Mem Univ Med Ctr, Savannah, GA USA
[4] E Texas Med Ctr, Tyler, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Via Christi Reg Med Ctr, Wichita, KS USA
来源
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; low-molecular weight heparin; INTERMITTENT PNEUMATIC COMPRESSION; INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE; ENOXAPARIN; THROMHOEMBOLISM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cab9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk in trauma patients. Although low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is effective in VTE prophylaxis, its use for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in blunt intracranial injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of LMWH chemoprophylaxis on patients with intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt trauma. Patients with brain Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or higher, age 18 years or older, and at least one repeated head computed tomographic scan were included. Patients with previous VTE; on preinjury anticoagulation; hospitalized for less than 48 hours; on heparin for VTE prophylaxis; or required emergent thoracic, abdominal, or vascular surgery at admission were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received LMWH and those who did not. The primary outcome was progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated head computed tomographic scan. RESULTS: The study included 1,215 patients, of which 220 patients (18.1%) received LMWH and 995 (81.9%) did not. Hemorrhage progression occurred in 239 of 995 control subjects and 93 of 220 LMWH patients (24% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Hemorrhage progression occurred in 32 patients after initiating LMWH (14.5%). Nine of these patients (4.1%) required neurosurgical intervention for hemorrhage progression. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving LMWH were at higher risk for hemorrhage progression. We were unable to demonstrate safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in patients with brain injury. The risk of using LMWH may exceed its benefit. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 625-628. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 628
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage After Chemical Prophylaxis Using Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
    Thier, Zachary T.
    Drake-Lavelle, Kelan
    Prest, Phillip J.
    Jones, Mark A.
    Reeves, Jeremy M.
    McClung-Smith, Catherine F.
    Goodwin, Tyler M.
    Villani, Nolan
    Metz, John
    Jackson, J. Benjamin
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (05) : 894 - 900
  • [32] VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENTS
    Saadi, Raghad
    Brandt, Kimberly
    Madlinger, Robert
    Nerenberg, Steven
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 790 - 790
  • [33] Low-molecular-weight heparin for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
    Brewer, D
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2005, 72 (01) : 75 - 76
  • [34] Low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the elderly
    Pineo, GF
    Hull, RD
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2005, 11 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [35] Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in pediatric traumatic brain injury
    van Erp, Inge A.
    Gaitanidis, Apostolos
    El Moheb, Mohamad
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    Saillant, Noelle
    Duhaime, Ann-Christine
    Mendoza, April E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2021, 27 (04) : 469 - 474
  • [36] Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
    Gazal, Stav
    Lebel, Eyal
    Kalish, Yosef
    Makranz, Chen
    Gatt, Moshe E.
    Goldschmidt, Neta
    Nachmias, Boaz
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 44 (1-2) : 52 - 57
  • [37] Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a trial sequential analysis
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chen, I-Wen
    Liu, Ping-Hsin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1839 - 1840
  • [38] Outcomes of low-molecular-weight heparin treatment for venous thromboembolism in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumours
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Linkins, Lori-Ann
    ALKindi, Said Y.
    Cheah, Matthew
    Crowther, Mark A.
    Iorio, Alfonso
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2017, 117 (03) : 589 - 594
  • [39] LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF VENOUS THROMBOSIS - A METAANALYSIS
    ROSENDAAL, FR
    NURMOHAMED, MT
    BULLER, HR
    DEKKER, E
    VANDENBROUCKE, JP
    BRIET, E
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1991, 65 (06) : 927 - 927
  • [40] THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS WITH LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN IN TRAUMA SURGERY
    BREYER, HG
    ALTHERIB, J
    BACHER, P
    WERNER, B
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1986, : 84 - 84