Is low-molecular-weight heparin safe for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury? A Western Trauma Association multicenter study

被引:54
|
作者
Kwiatt, Michael E. [1 ]
Patel, Mitul S. [1 ]
Ross, Steven E. [1 ]
Lachant, Mary T. [1 ]
MacNew, Heather G. [3 ]
Ochsner, M. Gage [3 ]
Norwood, Scott H. [4 ]
Speier, LaDonna [4 ]
Kozar, Rosemary [5 ]
Gerber, Jonathan A. [5 ]
Rowell, Susan [6 ]
Krishnakumar, Sheetal [6 ]
Livingston, David H. [2 ]
Manis, George [2 ]
Haan, James M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Cooper Univ Hosp, Off Surg Educ, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Univ Hosp, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Mem Univ Med Ctr, Savannah, GA USA
[4] E Texas Med Ctr, Tyler, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Via Christi Reg Med Ctr, Wichita, KS USA
来源
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; low-molecular weight heparin; INTERMITTENT PNEUMATIC COMPRESSION; INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE; ENOXAPARIN; THROMHOEMBOLISM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cab9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk in trauma patients. Although low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is effective in VTE prophylaxis, its use for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in blunt intracranial injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of LMWH chemoprophylaxis on patients with intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt trauma. Patients with brain Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or higher, age 18 years or older, and at least one repeated head computed tomographic scan were included. Patients with previous VTE; on preinjury anticoagulation; hospitalized for less than 48 hours; on heparin for VTE prophylaxis; or required emergent thoracic, abdominal, or vascular surgery at admission were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received LMWH and those who did not. The primary outcome was progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated head computed tomographic scan. RESULTS: The study included 1,215 patients, of which 220 patients (18.1%) received LMWH and 995 (81.9%) did not. Hemorrhage progression occurred in 239 of 995 control subjects and 93 of 220 LMWH patients (24% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Hemorrhage progression occurred in 32 patients after initiating LMWH (14.5%). Nine of these patients (4.1%) required neurosurgical intervention for hemorrhage progression. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving LMWH were at higher risk for hemorrhage progression. We were unable to demonstrate safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in patients with brain injury. The risk of using LMWH may exceed its benefit. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 625-628. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 628
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients
    Gowler, Aimee
    Erstad, Brian
    Tang, Andrew
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 33 (05): : E52 - E52
  • [2] Unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma
    Jacobs, Benjamin N.
    Cain-Nielsen, Anne H.
    Jakubus, Jill L.
    Mikhail, Judy N.
    Fath, John J.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Hemmila, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2017, 83 (01): : 151 - 158
  • [3] Low-molecular-weight heparin: Prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism
    Pineo, GF
    Hull, RD
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 1997, 48 : 79 - 91
  • [4] Prescription of low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients
    Ambrosi, P
    Calise, G
    Villani, P
    Luccioni, R
    Bouvenot, G
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2000, 29 (26): : 1447 - 1450
  • [5] Lower Mortality and Morbidity with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spine Trauma
    Neifert, Sean N.
    Chapman, Emily K.
    Rothrock, Robert J.
    Gilligan, Jeffrey
    Yuk, Frank
    McNeill, Ian T.
    Rasouli, Jonathan J.
    Gal, Jonathan S.
    Caridi, John M.
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (23) : 1613 - 1618
  • [6] Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin is Superior for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Geriatric Trauma Patients
    Deusenberry, Christina
    Bardsley, Casey
    Hobbs, Gerald
    Wilson, Alison M.
    Bardes, James
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : E61 - E61
  • [7] Evaluation of the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients
    du Plessis, J. A.
    van Blydenstein, S. A.
    Wong, M.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 110 (03): : 235 - 242
  • [8] Early Venous Thromboembolic Event Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: Risks and Benefits
    Dudley, Roy R.
    Aziz, Ishtiaque
    Bonnici, Andre
    Saluja, Rajeet S.
    Lamoureux, Julie
    Kalmovitch, Boaz
    Gursahaney, Ash
    Razek, Tarek
    Maleki, Mohammad
    Marcoux, Judith
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2010, 27 (12) : 2165 - 2172
  • [9] Low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism
    Schafer, AI
    HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1997, 32 (01): : 99 - &
  • [10] Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism
    tenCate, JW
    Buller, HR
    Gent, M
    Hirsh, J
    Prins, MH
    Baildon, R
    Lensing, AWA
    Anderson, DR
    vanBeek, EJR
    Fiesinger, JN
    Tijssen, JGP
    vanBarneveld, A
    Eimers, LT
    Graafsma, YP
    Hettiarachchi, R
    Hutten, B
    Redekop, K
    Haley, S
    LIberale, L
    Finch, T
    Whittaker, S
    Wilkinson, L
    Prandoni, P
    Villalta, S
    Girolami, B
    Bagatella, P
    Rossi, L
    Girolami, A
    Piovella, F
    Barone, M
    Beltrametti, C
    Serafini, S
    Siragusa, S
    Ascari, E
    Kovacs, MJ
    Morrow, B
    Kovacs, J
    Kuijer, PMM
    Koopman, MMW
    Jagt, H
    Weitz, J
    Kearon, C
    Biagioni, L
    Haas, S
    Lossner, F
    Spengel, FA
    Berger, M
    Demers, C
    Poulin, J
    vanderMeer, J
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (10): : 657 - 662