Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of similarities of preferences: A proposal

被引：3
|
作者：
Vazquez, Carmen [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Matemat, Fac Econ, Vigo 36310, Spain
来源：
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2014年 / 67卷
关键词：
POWER SET; CHOICE; EXTENSION; FREEDOM;
D O I：
10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.11.001
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
This paper provides a different proposal for ranking sets of alternatives in terms of a lexicographic rule. We discuss how intensity of preference over alternatives may affect an individual's choice out of the available set of alternatives. We provide an axiomatic characterization of an ordering rule for ranking sets of available alternatives, taking into account the similarities of the elements within each set. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：23 / 26
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selecting and Ranking Business Processes with Preferences: An Approach Based on Fuzzy Sets
    Abbaci, Katia
    Lemos, Fernando
    Hadjali, Allel
    Grigori, Daniela
    Lietard, Ludovic
    Rocacher, Daniel
    Bouzeghoub, Mokrane
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2011, PT I, 2011, 7044 : 38 - +
  • [32] Some remarks on ranking opportunity sets and Arrow impossibility theorems: correspondence results
    Alcalde-Unzu, J
    Ballester, MA
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2005, 124 (01) : 116 - 123
  • [33] RANKING PREFERENCES
    GOODMAN, N
    HASTORF, AH
    RICHARDSON, SA
    AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1967, 32 (05) : 815 - 816
  • [34] On ranking opportunity distributions
    Jorge Alcalde-Unzu
    Miguel A. Ballester
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2010, 34 : 3 - 31
  • [35] On ranking opportunity distributions
    Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge
    Ballester, Miguel A.
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2010, 34 (01) : 3 - 31
  • [36] Similarities Between Ranking and Rating Measures of Values Preferences Evidence From a Latent Class Segmentation Approach
    Moors, Guy
    Vriens, Ingrid
    Gelissen, John
    METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2017, 13 (03) : 113 - 122
  • [37] RANKING PREFERENCES - REPLY
    MATTHEWS, V
    AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1967, 32 (05) : 816 - 817
  • [38] The Likelihood Ranking Methods for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Considering Risk Preferences
    Zhao, Meng
    Qin, Song-song
    Li, Qi-wang
    Lu, Fu-qiang
    Shen, Zhe
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [39] Ranking from Stochastic Pairwise Preferences: Recovering Condorcet Winners and Tournament Solution Sets at the Top
    Rajkumar, Arun
    Ghoshal, Suprovat
    Lim, Lek-Heng
    Agarwal, Shivani
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 37, 2015, 37 : 665 - 673
  • [40] Collaborative Ranking for Local Preferences
    Kapicioglu, Berk
    Rosenberg, David S.
    Schapire, Robert E.
    Jebara, Tony
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 33, 2014, 33 : 466 - 474
12345