Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in an In Vitro Catheter-Related Biofilm Model Correlates with Poor Therapeutic Outcomes in Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

被引:59
|
作者
Abdelhady, Wessam [1 ]
Bayer, Arnold S. [1 ,2 ]
Seidl, Kati [3 ]
Nast, Cynthia C. [2 ,4 ]
Kiedrowski, Megan R. [5 ]
Horswill, Alexander R. [5 ]
Yeaman, Michael R. [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Yan Q. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Los Angeles Biomed Res Inst, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; EPIDERMIDIS BIOFILMS; EXTRACELLULAR DNA; INFECTIONS; BACTEREMIA; ANTIBIOTICS; DAPTOMYCIN; EXPRESSION; EFFICACY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1128/AAC.02073-12
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of endovascular infections, including catheter sepsis and infective endocarditis (IE). Vancomycin (VAN) is the primary choice for treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. However, high rates of VAN treatment failure in MRSA infections caused by VAN-susceptible strains have been increasingly reported. Biofilm-associated MRSA infections are especially prone to clinical antibiotic failure. The present studies examined potential relationships between MRSA susceptibility to VAN in biofilms in vitro and nonsusceptibility to VAN in endovascular infection in vivo. Using 10 "VAN-susceptible" MRSA bloodstream isolates previously investigated for VAN responsiveness in experimental IE, we studied the mechanism(s) of such in vivo VAN resistance, including: (i) VAN binding to MRSA organisms; (ii) the impact of VAN on biofilm formation and biofilm composition; (iii) VAN efficacy in an in vitro catheter-related biofilm model; (iv) effects on cell wall thickness. As a group, the five strains previously categorized as VAN nonresponders (non-Rsp) in the experimental IE model differed from the five responders (Rsp) in terms of lower VAN binding, increased biofilm formation, higher survival in the presence of VAN within biofilms in the presence or absence of catheters, and greater biofilm reduction upon proteinase K treatment. Interestingly, sub-MICs of VAN significantly promoted biofilm formation only in the non-Rsp isolates. Cell wall thickness was similar among all MRSA strains. These results suggest that sublethal VAN levels that induce biofilm formation and reduce efficacy of VAN in the in vitro catheter-associated biofilms may contribute to suboptimal treatment outcomes for endovascular infections caused by "VAN-susceptible" MRSA strains.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of telavancin in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
    Madrigal, AG
    Basuino, L
    Chambers, HF
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (08) : 3163 - 3165
  • [32] Activities of dalbavancin in vitro and in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus with or without reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin
    Lefort, A
    Pavie, J
    Garry, L
    Chau, F
    Fantin, B
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 48 (03) : 1061 - 1064
  • [33] In Vitro Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates to Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolide and Daptomycin
    Celikbilek, Nevreste
    Ozdem, Birsen
    Gurelik, Feryal C.
    Guvenman, Selda
    Guner, H. Rahmet
    Acikgoz, Ziya Cibali
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 512 - 518
  • [34] Impact of Reduced Vancomycin MIC on Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Park, So-Youn
    Oh, In-Hwan
    Lee, Hee-Joo
    Ihm, Chun-Gyoo
    Son, Jun Seong
    Lee, Mi Suk
    Kim, Mi-Na
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 57 (11) : 5536 - 5542
  • [35] Evaluation of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility to Daptomycin and Vancomycin in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model
    Barber, Katie E.
    Smith, Jordan R.
    Ireland, Cortney E.
    Boles, Blaise R.
    Rose, Warren E.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (08) : 4497 - 4503
  • [36] Comparison of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Sacar, M.
    Sacar, S.
    Cevahir, N.
    Onem, G.
    Teke, Z.
    Asan, A.
    Turgut, H.
    Adali, F.
    Kaleli, I.
    Susam, I.
    Yaylali, Y. Tolga
    Baltalarli, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : S76 - S76
  • [37] Prior Vancomycin Use Is a Risk Factor for Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Methicillin-Susceptible but Not Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Mascitti, Kara B.
    Edelstein, Paul H.
    Fishman, Neil O.
    Morales, Knashawn H.
    Baltus, Andrew J.
    Lautenbach, Ebbing
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (02): : 160 - 166
  • [38] Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia In Vitro and in an Experimental Endocarditis Model
    Xiong, Yan Q.
    Fowler, Vance G., Jr.
    Yeaman, Michael R.
    Perdreau-Remington, Francoise
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    Bayer, Arnold S.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 199 (02): : 201 - 208
  • [39] Evaluation of ceftobiprole in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
    Chambers, HF
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (03) : 884 - 888
  • [40] TEICOPLANIN COMPARED WITH VANCOMYCIN FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS DUE TO METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS
    GALETTO, DW
    BOSCIA, JA
    KOBASA, WD
    KAYE, D
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1986, 154 (01): : 69 - 75