Performance Comparison of Different Optimization Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Toptas, Buket [1 ]
Karadeniz, Esra [2 ]
Karci, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Bilgisayar Muhendisligi Bolumu, Muhendislik Fak, Malatya, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Yazilim Muhendisligi Bolumu, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
ABC; PSO; FA; BBO; SOS; COLONY; HYBRID;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Optimization algorithms are popular approaches to solving problems in many field. By considering the performance criteria of the optimization algorithms, optimization algorithms suitable for the topic are selected. In this study, the performance criteria of the five optimization algorithms, which have the same mathematical test functions and the parameter values of these functions and the decision variables, the number of populations and the number of execution cycles of the algorithm, are compared. Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Fire Beetle Algorithm, Symbiotic Organism Algorithm and Biogeography Based Optimization Algorithm are used as optimization algorithms. Performance measures of these five optimization algorithms are calculated on three different benchmarking algorithms. The calculation results are presented as numerical values.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of performance between different selection strategies on simple genetic algorithms
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Hu, Xiaomin
    Gu, Min
    Zhang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELLING, CONTROL & AUTOMATION JOINTLY WITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AGENTS, WEB TECHNOLOGIES & INTERNET COMMERCE, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1115 - +
  • [32] Comparison of different machine learning algorithms for predicting the SAGD production performance
    Huang, Ziteng
    Chen, Zhangxin
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 202
  • [33] Performance Investigation and Comparison of Two Evolutionary Algorithms in Portfolio Optimization: Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization
    Talebi, Arash
    Molaei, Mohammad Ali
    Sheikh, Mohammad Javad
    2010 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (ICIFE), 2010, : 430 - 437
  • [34] Correction to: Qualitative and Quantitative Performance Comparison of Recent Optimization Algorithms for Economic Optimization of the Heat Exchangers
    Vivek K. Patel
    Bansi D. Raja
    Vimal J. Savsani
    Ali Rıza Yıldız
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28 : 271 - 271
  • [35] Optimization design and performance comparison of different powertrains of electric vehicles
    Du, Wei
    Zhao, Shengdun
    Jin, Liying
    Gao, Jingzhou
    Zheng, Zhenhao
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2021, 156
  • [36] Performance Comparison of Different Optimization Methods under the Same Conditions
    Altun, Sara
    Varjovi, Mahdi Hatami
    Karci, Ali
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP), 2018,
  • [37] Performance Evaluation Among Different Optimization Algorithms for Prostate IMRT and VMAT Planning
    Chung, J.
    Kang, S.
    Kim, J.
    Kang, S.
    Kim, K.
    Eom, K.
    Song, C.
    Suh, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E300 - E300
  • [38] Performance Optimization of Parallel Algorithms
    Hudik, Martin
    Hodon, Michal
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS, 2014, 16 (04) : 436 - 446
  • [39] Optimal design and performance analysis of coastal microgrid using different optimization algorithms
    Bakeer, Abualkasim
    Elmorshedy, Mahmoud F.
    Salama, Hossam S.
    Elkadeem, Mohamed R.
    Almakhles, Dhafer J.
    Kotb, Kotb M.
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 105 (06) : 4499 - 4523
  • [40] Optimal design and performance analysis of coastal microgrid using different optimization algorithms
    Abualkasim Bakeer
    Mahmoud F. Elmorshedy
    Hossam S. Salama
    Mohamed R. Elkadeem
    Dhafer J. Almakhles
    Kotb M. Kotb
    Electrical Engineering, 2023, 105 : 4499 - 4523