Unifying population and landscape ecology with spatial capture-recapture

被引:91
|
作者
Royle, J. Andrew [1 ]
Fuller, Angela K. [2 ]
Sutherland, Christopher [3 ]
机构
[1] Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, US Geol Survey, New York Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Dept Nat Resources, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] UMASS Amherst, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA USA
关键词
MARK-RECAPTURE; TELEMETRY DATA; DENSITY; MODELS; INFERENCE; SIZE; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; DISPERSAL; BEARS;
D O I
10.1111/ecog.03170
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Spatial heterogeneity in the environment induces variation in population demographic rates and dispersal patterns, which result in spatio-temporal variation in density and gene flow. Unfortunately, applying theory to learn about the role of spatial structure on populations has been hindered by the lack of mechanistic spatial models and inability to make precise observations of population state and structure. Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) represents an individual-based analytic framework for overcoming this fundamental obstacle that has limited the utility of ecological theory. SCR methods make explicit use of spatial encounter information on individuals in order to model density and other spatial aspects of animal population structure, and they have been widely adopted in the last decade. We review the historical context and emerging developments in SCR models that enable the integration of explicit ecological hypotheses about landscape connectivity, movement, resource selection, and spatial variation in density, directly with individual encounter history data obtained by new technologies (e.g. camera trapping, non-invasive DNA sampling). We describe ways in which SCR methods stand to advance the study of animal population ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 456
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data: comment
    Marques, Tiago A.
    Thomas, Len
    Royle, J. Andrew
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2011, 92 (02) : 526 - 528
  • [32] The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture-recapture analysis
    Sun, Catherine
    Burton, A. Cole
    [J]. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2024, 2024 (03)
  • [33] Capture-recapture models
    Pollock, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) : 293 - 296
  • [34] Experimental evaluation of spatial capture-recapture study design
    Fleming, Jill
    Grant, Evan H. Campbell
    Sterrett, Sean C.
    Sutherland, Chris
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 31 (07)
  • [35] Bayesian model selection for spatial capture-recapture models
    Dey, Soumen
    Delampady, Mohan
    Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (20): : 11569 - 11583
  • [36] Spatial capture-recapture with random thinning for unidentified encounters
    Jimenez, Jose
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Linden, Daniel W.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (03): : 1187 - 1198
  • [37] Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture-recapture
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Sun, Catherine C.
    Fuller, Angela K.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 4 (06): : 520 - 530
  • [38] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE ESTIMATION
    DARROCH, JN
    RATCLIFF, D
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (01) : 149 - 153
  • [39] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS
    NICHOLS, JD
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 1992, 42 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [40] A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities
    van Dam-Bates, Paul
    Papathomas, Michail
    Stevenson, Ben C.
    Fewster, Rachel M.
    Turek, Daniel
    Stewart, Frances E. C.
    Borchers, David L.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2024, 80 (01)