Evaluating the holistic costs and benefits of corn production systems in Minnesota, US

被引:15
|
作者
Sandhu, Harpinder [1 ]
Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage [2 ]
Warner, Chris [3 ]
Behzadnejad, Fatemeh [3 ]
Keohane, Kieran [3 ]
Houston, Richard [3 ]
Fujiwara, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] UN, Food & Agr Org, Rome, Italy
[3] Simetrica, London, England
关键词
NITROGEN-FERTILIZER; OXIDE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-60826-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Global agriculture aims to minimize its impacts on environment and human health while maintaining its productivity. This requires a comprehensive understanding of its benefits and costs to ecosystems and society. Here, we apply a new evaluation framework developed by the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food (TEEBAgriFood) to assess key benefits and costs on the production side of genetically modified (GM) and organic corn systems in Minnesota, USA. The market value of GM corn is $4.5 billion, and only $31.8 million for organic corn using production data and market prices of 2017. GM corn generates revenue of $1488 per hectare (at $121 per MT), which is significantly lower than the organic corn at $2793 per hectare (at $294 per MT). Using a novel three-stage wellbeing valuation, analysis of the associations between corn production intensity and subjective measures of general health and wellbeing indicates that the total non-financial health cost associated with GM corn is $427.50 per hectare or $1.3 billion annually. We also find that the total annual environmental cost associated with GM corn production is $179 per hectare or $557.65 million within Minnesota. The use of the evaluation framework can help to improve decision making at farm and policy level to develop sustainable agriculture in order to minimize environmental and health related costs to society and economy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies
    Tammy M. Thompson
    Sebastian Rausch
    Rebecca K. Saari
    Noelle E. Selin
    Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 : 917 - 923
  • [42] Bright spots in US corn production
    Burchfield, Emily K.
    Schumacher, Britta L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
  • [43] CORN-SOYBEAN TILLAGE SYSTEMS - EROSION CONTROL, EFFECTS ON CROP PRODUCTION, COSTS
    SIEMENS, JC
    OSCHWALD, WR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1978, 21 (02): : 293 - 302
  • [44] A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
    FRENCH, MT
    ZARKIN, GA
    BRAY, JW
    JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES, 1995, 25 (02) : 451 - 470
  • [45] A simple model for evaluating the costs and benefits of aquatic macrophytes
    Van Nes, EH
    van den Berg, MS
    Clayton, JS
    Coops, H
    Scheffer, M
    van Ierland, E
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1999, 415 (0) : 335 - 339
  • [46] Urban influence on costs of production in the Corn Belt
    Nehring, Richard
    Barnard, Charles
    Banker, David
    Breneman, Vince
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (04) : 930 - 946
  • [47] A simple model for evaluating the costs and benefits of aquatic macrophytes
    Egbert H. Van Nes
    Marcel. S. van den Berg
    John S. Clayton
    Hugo Coops
    Marten Scheffer
    Ekko van Ierland
    Hydrobiologia, 1999, 415 : 335 - 339
  • [48] OPERATING VS CAPITAL COSTS - EVALUATING TRADEOFF BENEFITS
    BUEHLER, JD
    FIGGE, GJ
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1971, 78 (03) : 96 - &
  • [49] Evaluating Benefits, Costs, and Social Value as Predictors of Gratitude
    Forster, Daniel E.
    Pedersen, Eric J.
    McCullough, Michael E.
    Lieberman, Debra
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (04) : 538 - 549
  • [50] Costs and Benefits of Reputation Management Systems
    Cascella, Roberto G.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON A WORLD OF WIRELESS, MOBILE AND MULTIMEDIA NETWORKS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 431 - 438