The dingo and biodiversity conservation: response to Fleming et al. (2012)

被引：21

作者：

Johnson, Chris N. ^{[1
]}

Ritchie, Euan G. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Zool, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia

[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia

来源：

AUSTRALIAN MAMMALOGY | 2013年 / 35卷 / 01期

基金：

澳大利亚研究理事会;

关键词：

Canis lupus; ecological restoration; feral cat; mesopredator release; red fox; trophic cascade; FOXES VULPES-VULPES; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; RED FOXES; WESTERN-AUSTRALIA; MESOPREDATOR RELEASE; TANAMI DESERT; TOP PREDATORS; ECOSYSTEMS; POPULATION; ECOLOGY;

D O I：

10.1071/AM12005

中图分类号：

Q95 [动物学];

学科分类号：

071002 ;

摘要：

Several authors have recently argued that dingoes could be used to help conserve biodiversity in Australia. Fleming et al. (2012) [Australian Mammalogy 34, 119-131] offer the alternative view that restoration of dingo predation is unlikely to help native species, and is more likely to do harm. We think many of the arguments used by Fleming et al. to reach that conclusion are either unsound or beside the point, and we explain why.

引用

页码：8 / 14

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] Response to letters by Baethge et al. and Martino et al.
Marwaha, Steven
Thompson, Andrew
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2017, 5
[32] Response to the letters by Kun et al. and Booth et al.
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef
Sierra, Carlos
Egenolf, Vincent
Woerdehoff, Rene
Irsinger, Roland
Baldamus, Conrad
Stupak, Inge
Spellmann, Hermann
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2020, 12 (12): : 1038 - 1043
[33] Response to Comments by Timpson et al. and Yu et al.
Mekel-Bobrov, Nitzan
Lahn, Bruce T.
SCIENCE, 2007, 317 (5841)
[34] Response to Provenzano et al. and De Carlo et al.
Kalchiem-Dekel, Or
Bestvina, Christine M.
Gainor, Justin F.
Drilon, Alexander
Lin, Jessica J.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (02) : E13 - E14
[35] A need for the wholistic application of genetics to biodiversity conservation; a response to Taylor et al
Hoelzel, A. Rus
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 39 (02) : 123 - 124
[36] Debating the ecosystem service rationale for conservation: Response to Kremen et al.
Ghazoul, Jaboury
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 799 - 801
[37] Killing with compassion for the sake of conservation: response to Lynn et al. 2019
Crespin, Silvio J.
Moreira-Arce, Dario
Simonetti, Javier A.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 1035 - 1037
[38] Challenges in Columbia River fisheries conservation: a response to Duda et al.
Hand, Brian K.
Flint, Courtney G.
Frissell, Chris A.
Muhlfeld, Clint C.
Devlin, Shawn P.
Kennedy, Brian P.
Crabtree, Robert L.
McKee, W. Arthur
Luikart, Gordon
Stanford, Jack A.
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (01) : 11 - 13
[39] Clarifying compassionate conservation with hypotheticals: response to Wallach et al. 2018
Rohwer, Yasha
Marris, Emma
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 781 - 783
[40] Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation: Response to Allendorf et al.
Wainwright, TC
Waples, RS
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (05) : 1144 - 1147

← 1 2 3 4 5 →