Fracture mechanisms of Al/steel resistance spot welds in coach peel and cross tension testing

被引:47
|
作者
Chen, Nannan [1 ]
Wang, Hui -Ping [2 ]
Carlson, Blair E. [2 ]
Sigler, David R. [2 ]
Wang, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Shanghai Key Lab Mat Laser Proc & Modificat, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] GM Global R&D, Mfg Syst Res, Warren, MI 48092 USA
关键词
Resistance spot welds; Dissimilar materials; Weld microstructure; Intermetallic compound; Fracture mechanism; Coach peel test; Cross tension test; ALUMINUM-ALLOY; INTERMETALLIC COMPOUND; STEEL; AL; MICROSTRUCTURES; STRENGTH; JOINTS; LAYER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.035
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In Al/steel resistance spot welding, increasing welding current helped to reduce generation of dendritic grains and shrinkage, and increasing welding time tended to reduce shrinkage but promoted the transition of grains from preferable columnar to dendritic. Iron phase, existing between the Fe2Al5 fingers of a thin IMC layer facing the steel side, was observed to serve as crack propagation inhibitor and improve load carrying capacity of Al/steel interface. The amount of iron phase decreased as the IMC thickness grew, so did the load bearing capacity. Three fracture modes were observed in the cross tension test: interfacial fracture in the IMC layer, partial thickness fracture within the Al nugget next to the IMC layer, and partial button pullout fracture. All fractured coach peel test samples displayed consistent partial button pullout fracture mode following large deformation of the Al sheet. The crack in the cross tension test always initiated in the IMC layer while the crack in the coach peel test often started in the Al fusion zone. Two characteristic peak points were observed in the load-displacement curves of the coach peel test. The key point for improving mechanical performance under coach peel loading was to increase the first peak point by reducing Al thinning, increasing the Al nugget size, and limiting the IMC layer growth.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 361
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Microstructure and Shear Strength of Novel Aluminum to Steel Resistance Spot Welds
    Kang, J.
    Shi, L.
    Shalchi-Amirkhiz, B.
    Sigler, D. R.
    Haselhuhn, A. S.
    Carlson, B. E.
    WELDING JOURNAL, 2020, 99 (03) : 67S - 74S
  • [42] Weld growth mechanism of resistance spot welds in zinc coated steel
    Harlin, N
    Jones, TB
    Parker, JD
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 143 : 448 - 453
  • [43] Comparison of metallurgical and ultrasonic inspections of galvanized steel resistance spot welds
    Potter, TJ
    Ghaffari, B
    Mozurkewich, G
    Reverdy, F
    Hopkins, D
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 25A AND 25B, 2006, 820 : 1786 - 1793
  • [44] Investigation of the Tensile Shear fracture of Advanced High Strength Steel spot welds
    Dancette, S.
    Fabregue, D.
    Massardier, V.
    Merlin, J.
    Dupuy, T.
    Bouzekri, M.
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2012, 25 : 112 - 122
  • [46] Mechanical properties of dissimilar Ti-Al resistance spot welds
    Ertan, Rukiye
    MATERIALS TESTING, 2020, 62 (06) : 597 - 602
  • [47] EFFECT OF ELECTRODE FORCE ON FRACTURE TYPE OF DQSK STEEL RESISTANCE SPOT WELDS (vol 19, pg 149, 2013)
    Rout, Pradeep C.
    ACTA METALLURGICA SLOVACA, 2013, 19 (03): : 232 - 232
  • [48] Fatigue life prediction for spot welds in coach-peel and lap-shear specimens with consideration of kinked crack behaviour
    Lin, SH
    Pan, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 20 (1-3): : 31 - 50
  • [49] INFLUENCE OF CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION ON THE CROSS TENSION FATIGUE-STRENGTH OF SPOT WELDS IN HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL SHEETS
    HERAI, T
    MIZUI, M
    MATSUMURA, O
    SEKINE, T
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 1983, 23 (08) : B314 - B314
  • [50] Fatigue behavior of dissimilar spot friction welds in lap-shear and cross-tension specimens of aluminum and steel sheets
    Tran, V. -X.
    Pan, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2010, 32 (07) : 1167 - 1179