Time- and frequency-domain hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin solvers for the calculation of the Cherenkov radiation

被引:3
|
作者
La Spina, Andrea [1 ]
Fish, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Time domain; Frequency domain; Hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin; Cherenkov radiation; Maxwell?s equations; Perfectly matched layers; SMITH-PURCELL RADIATION; MIXED FINITE-ELEMENTS; DEGREE ADAPTIVITY; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2022.115170
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This work proposes novel hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) methods, both in the time and in the frequency domain, to accurately compute the Cherenkov radiation emitted by a charged particle travelling in a uniform medium at superluminal speed. The adopted formulations enrich existing HDG approaches for the solution of Maxwell's equations by including perfectly matched layers (PMLs) to effectively absorb the outgoing waves and Floquet-periodic boundary conditions to connect the boundaries of the computational domain in the direction of the moving charge. A wave propagation problem with smooth solution is used to show the optimal convergence of the HDG variables and the superconvergence of the postprocessed electric field and a second example examines the role of the PML parameters on the absorption of the electromagnetic field. A series of numerical experiments both in 3D and 2D-axisymmetric components show the capability of the proposed methods to faithfully reproduce Cherenkovian effects in different conditions and their high accuracy is confirmed by comparing the numerical results with the Frank-Tamm formula.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time- and Frequency-Domain Characterization of Railgun Sliding Contact Noise
    Engel, Thomas G.
    Rada, Nicholas M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (07) : 1321 - 1326
  • [32] Critical comparison between time- and frequency-domain relaxation functions
    Snyder, CR
    Mopsik, FI
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 60 (02): : 984 - 990
  • [33] LFT uncertain model validation with time- and frequency-domain measurements
    Xu, DM
    Ren, Z
    Gu, GX
    Chen, J
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1999, 44 (07) : 1435 - 1441
  • [34] Time- and frequency-domain analysis of fluorescence lifetime for temperature sensors
    Fernicola, VC
    Rosso, L
    2000 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS DIGEST, 2000, : 587 - 588
  • [35] Unified Time- and Frequency-Domain Approach for Accurate Modeling of Electromagnetic Radiation Processes in Ultrawideband Antennas
    Caratelli, Diego
    Yarovoy, Alexander
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2010, 58 (10) : 3239 - 3255
  • [36] Time- and frequency-domain responses of the brain to standard experimental paradigms
    Karakas, S
    Erzengin, ÖU
    Çakmak, ED
    2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Vols 1 and 2, Symposium Record, 2003, : 840 - 843
  • [37] Scattering and Radiation Simulation by Discontinuous Galerkin Time Domain Method
    Cui, Xuewu
    Zhou, Longjian
    Gao, Min
    Liang, Zhipeng
    Yan, Fei
    Yang, Feng
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION & USNC/URSI NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, 2017, : 1797 - 1798
  • [38] A Novel Imposing Source Approach in the Implicit Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Domain Method for Electromagnetics
    Li, Xing
    Xu, Li
    Yang, Zhong-Hai
    Li, Bin
    IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS LETTERS, 2020, 30 (04) : 327 - 330
  • [39] Comparison between time- and frequency-domain high-frequency device characterizations
    Bieler, Mark
    Arz, Uwe
    2016 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2016), 2016,
  • [40] Time- vs. frequency-domain femtosecond surface sum frequency generation
    Roke, S
    Kleyn, AW
    Bonn, M
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2003, 370 (1-2) : 227 - 232