Independent Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts

被引:24
|
作者
Li, Qi [1 ]
Nan, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
COGNITIVE CONTROL MECHANISMS; DIMENSIONAL OVERLAP; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; HUMAN BRAIN; STROOP-LIKE; SIMON; COMPATIBILITY; MODEL; TASK; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0089249
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The dimensional overlap (DO) model proposes distinct mechanisms for stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) conflict effects. Many studies have examined the independence of S-S and S-R conflict effects in the color-word Stroop and Simon tasks. However, confounds exist between the distinction of DO (i.e., S-S dimensional overlap compared with S-R dimensional overlap) and the distinction of stimulus attributes (e.g., color compared with spatial location; semantic compared with nonsemantic information), which may hinder interpretation of the independence of S-S and S-R conflicts. A spatial Stroop (word) task and a spatial Stroop (arrow) task were combined with a Simon task in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively to eliminate these confounds of stimulus attributes. The results showed that S-S and S-R conflicts affected performance additively. There was no significant correlation across participants. These findings lend further support to independent processing of S-S and S-R conflicts as it is outlined in the taxonomy of DO.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing of Vocalizations: A Systematic Replication
    Rader, Lisa
    Sidener, Tina M.
    Reeve, Kenneth F.
    Sidener, DavidW.
    Delmolino, Lara
    Miliotis, Adriane
    Carbone, Vincent
    ANALYSIS OF VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 30 (01): : 69 - 74
  • [32] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Yang Seok Cho
    Robert W. Proctor
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 45 - 73
  • [33] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Cho, YS
    Proctor, RW
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (01) : 45 - 73
  • [34] ULTRASTABLE STIMULUS-RESPONSE LATENCIES - TOWARDS A MODEL OF RESPONSE STIMULUS SYNCHRONIZATION
    HOPKINS, GW
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1984, 423 (MAY) : 16 - 29
  • [35] Investigation of stimulus-response compatibility using a startling acoustic stimulus
    Maslovat, Dana
    Carlsen, Anthony N.
    Franks, Ian M.
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2012, 78 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [36] ULTRASTABLE STIMULUS-RESPONSE LATENCIES - ACQUISITION AND STIMULUS-CONTROL
    HOPKINS, GW
    KRISTOFFERSON, AB
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 27 (03): : 241 - 250
  • [37] Relationship between Language Dominance and Stimulus-Stimulus or Stimulus-Response Inhibition in Uyghur-Chinese Bilinguals with an Investigation of Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs
    Wu, Ruilin
    Struys, Esli
    Lochtman, Katja
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (04)
  • [38] STIMULUS-RESPONSE THEORY AND EXPECTANCY
    TREISMAN, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 51 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [39] ARE STIMULUS RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY EFFECTS FACILITATED BY EMOTION SPECIFIC STIMULUS-RESPONSE FIT OR MAPPING OF STIMULUS VALENCE?
    Schulz, Stefan M.
    Neumann, Roland
    Alpers, Georg W.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 47 : S75 - S76
  • [40] Temporal stimulus-response compatibility
    Grosjean, M
    Mordkoff, JT
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (04) : 870 - 878