A Combined Optimal Sensor Placement Strategy for the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridge Structures

被引:24
|
作者
He, Can [1 ]
Xing, Jianchun [1 ]
Li, Juelong [2 ]
Yang, Qiliang [1 ]
Wang, Ronghao [1 ]
Zhang, Xun [1 ]
机构
[1] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Def Engn, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Management Off Naval Def Engn, Beijing 100841, Peoples R China
关键词
IDENTIFICATION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1155/2013/820694
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Optimal sensor placement is an important part in the structural health monitoring of bridge structures. However, some defects are present in the existing methods, such as the focus on a single optimal index, the selection of modal order and sensor number based on experience, and the long computation time. A hybrid optimization strategy named MSE-AGA is proposed in this study to address these problems. The approach firstly selects modal order using modal participation factor. Then, the modal strain energy method is adopted to conduct the initial sensor placement. Finally, the adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA) is utilized to determine the optimal number and locations of the sensors, which uses the root mean square of off-diagonal elements in the modal assurance criterion matrix as the fitness function. A case study of sensor placement on a numerically simulated bridge structure is provided to verify the effectiveness of the MSE-AGA strategy, and the AGA method without initial placement is used as a contrast experiment. A comparison of these strategies shows that the optimal results obtained by the MSE-AGA method have a high modal strain energy index, a short computation time, and small off-diagonal elements in the modal assurance criterion matrix.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal sensor placement for monitoring structural vulnerable scenarios
    State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
    200092, China
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao, 11 (1670-1676 and 1683):
  • [42] On Optimal Sensor Placement Criterion for Structural Health Monitoring with Representative Least Squares Method
    Li, Dong-Sheng
    Li, Hong-Nan
    Fritzen, Claus-Peter
    DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES VIII, 2009, 413-414 : 383 - +
  • [43] An optimal sensor placement design framework for structural health monitoring using Bayes risk
    Yang, Yichao
    Chadha, Mayank
    Hu, Zhen
    Todd, Michael D.
    Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 168
  • [44] An optimal sensor placement design framework for structural health monitoring using Bayes risk
    Yang, Yichao
    Chadha, Mayank
    Hu, Zhen
    Todd, Michael D.
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 168
  • [45] A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing
    Flynn, Eric B.
    Todd, Michael D.
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 24 (04) : 891 - 903
  • [46] Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge
    Heo, G
    Wang, ML
    Satpathi, D
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 1997, 16 (7-8) : 495 - 502
  • [47] Optimal Sensor Placement Strategy for Environmental Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks
    Castello, Charles C.
    Fan, Jeffrey
    Davari, Asad
    Chen, Ruei-Xi
    2010 42ND SOUTHEASTERN SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM THEORY (SSST), 2010,
  • [48] Optimal sensor placement strategy and sensor design for high quality system monitoring
    Gao, RX
    Wang, CT
    Sheng, SW
    SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2004: SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS, 2004, 5391 : 431 - 440
  • [49] Sensor Placement with Multiple Objectives for Structural Health Monitoring
    Bhuiyan, Md Zakirul Alam
    Wang, Guojun
    Cao, Jiannong
    Wu, Jie
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2014, 10 (04)
  • [50] Optimization of sensor placement for structural health monitoring: a review
    Ostachowicz, Wieslaw
    Soman, Rohan
    Malinowski, Pawel
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (03): : 963 - 988