The Sexunzipped Trial: Optimizing the Design of Online Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:36
|
作者
Bailey, Julia V. [1 ]
Pavlou, Menelaos [2 ]
Copas, Andrew [3 ]
McCarthy, Ona [4 ]
Carswell, Ken [5 ]
Rait, Greta [6 ]
Hart, Graham [7 ]
Nazareth, Irwin [6 ]
Free, Caroline [4 ]
French, Rebecca [4 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, E Hlth Unit, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Infect & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[5] Univ London, London, England
[6] UCL, PRIMENT Clin Trials Unit, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[7] UCL, Fac Populat Hlth Sci, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Internet; randomized controlled trials as topic; outcome assessment (health care); sexual health; sexually transmitted diseases; behavioral research; SEXUAL HEALTH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; RETENTION; RECRUITMENT; POPULATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.2668
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sexual health problems such as unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection are important public health concerns and there is huge potential for health promotion using digital interventions. Evaluations of digital interventions are increasingly conducted online. Trial administration and data collection online offers many advantages, but concerns remain over fraudulent registration to obtain compensation, the quality of self-reported data, and high attrition. Objective: This study addresses the feasibility of several dimensions of online trial design-recruitment, online consent, participant identity verification, randomization and concealment of allocation, online data collection, data quality, and retention at 3-month follow-up. Methods: Young people aged 16 to 20 years and resident in the United Kingdom were recruited to the "Sexunzipped" online trial between November 2010 and March 2011 (n=2036). Participants filled in baseline demographic and sexual health questionnaires online and were randomized to the Sexunzipped interactive intervention website or to an information-only control website. Participants were also randomly allocated to a postal request (or no request) for a urine sample for genital chlamydia testing and receipt of a lower (10 pound/US$16) or higher (20 pound/US$32) value shopping voucher compensation for 3-month outcome data. Results: The majority of the 2006 valid participants (90.98%, 1825/2006) were aged between 18 and 20 years at enrolment, from all four countries in the United Kingdom. Most were white (89.98%, 1805/2006), most were in school or training (77.48%, 1545/1994), and 62.81% (1260/2006) of the sample were female. In total, 3.88% (79/2036) of registrations appeared to be invalid and another 4.00% (81/2006) of participants gave inconsistent responses within the questionnaire. The higher value compensation (20 pound/US$32) increased response rates by 6-10%, boosting retention at 3 months to 77.2% (166/215) for submission of online self-reported sexual health outcomes and 47.4% (118/249) for return of chlamydia urine samples by post. Conclusions: It was quick and efficient to recruit young people to this online trial. Our procedures for obtaining online consent, verifying participant identity, automated randomization, and concealment of allocation worked well. The optimal response rate for the online sexual health outcome measurement was comparable to face-to-face trials. Multiple methods of participant contact, requesting online data only, and higher value compensation increased trial retention at 3-month follow-up.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Fast-Track Trials in Palliative Care: An Alternative Randomized Controlled Trial Design
    Farquhar, Morag
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Booth, Sara
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 12 (03) : 213 - 213
  • [12] The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
    van der Velden, Joanne M.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Burbach, Johannes P. M.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Relton, Clare
    van Gils, Carla H.
    May, Anne M.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [13] Promising alternative for classic randomized controlled trials: first experience with the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design in the oncologic setting
    Gregorowitsch, M.
    Van den Bongard, D.
    Young-Afat, D.
    Gernaat, S.
    May, A.
    Gal, R.
    Claire, R.
    Van Vulpen, M.
    Van Gils, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : S9 - S9
  • [14] Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity
    Sargeant, J. M.
    Kelton, D. F.
    O'Connor, A. M.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 61 : 18 - 27
  • [15] Design flaws in some randomized controlled trials
    Trenouth, M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (02) : 141 - 141
  • [17] How to design a randomized controlled trial
    Navaneethan, Sankar D.
    Palmer, Suetonia C.
    Smith, Alicia
    Johnson, David W.
    Strippoli, Giovanni F. M.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 (08) : 732 - 739
  • [18] Optimizing parameters in clinical trials with a randomized start or withdrawal design
    Xiong, Chengjie
    Luo, Jingqin
    Gao, Feng
    Morris, John C.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2014, 69 : 101 - 113
  • [19] HISTORY OF CLINICAL TRIALS The Emergence of the Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Bothwell, Laura E.
    Podolsky, Scott H.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (06): : 501 - 504
  • [20] Clinical Trial Registration and Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lockshin, Michael D.
    Katz, Patricia P.
    Yelin, Edward H.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (06): : 517 - 518