Gender, beliefs, and coordination with externalities q
被引:4
|
作者:
Cason, Timothy N.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
Krannert Sch Management, Dept Econ, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAPurdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
Cason, Timothy N.
[1
,4
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Gangadharan, Lata
[2
,5
]
Grossman, Philip J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
Univ Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
Monash Business Sch, Dept Econ, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic 3800, AustraliaPurdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
Grossman, Philip J.
[2
,3
,5
]
机构:
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
[4] Krannert Sch Management, Dept Econ, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[5] Monash Business Sch, Dept Econ, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
Groups such as committees or boards make many important decisions within organizations. Many of these decisions affect external parties. This paper uses an experimental approach to study how the gen-der composition of three-person groups affects choices and beliefs in a Coordination game with selfish and prosocial equilibria. We find that the social preferences of group members are a key determinant of the group's coordination choice. Controlling for social preferences of the group, groups with more women are more likely to make choices that are kinder to external parties. Both men and women believe that women will make kinder choices more frequently. Groups comprised of all men are expected to make 18 percentage points fewer kind choices than groups of all women. Men are also expected to be 9 percentage points less kind than women overall. These results have implications for public policies intended to increase gender diversity and women's representation on decision-making committees in the corporate sector, in politics, and in academia.CO 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.