Screening for dementia in general hospital inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of available instruments

被引:47
|
作者
Jackson, Thomas A. [1 ,2 ]
Naqvi, Syeda Huma [2 ]
Sheehan, Bart [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Immun & Infect, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Geriatr Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
关键词
dementia; screening; general hospital; older people; systematic review; ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MEDICAL INPATIENTS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; EARLY-DIAGNOSIS; PREVALENCE; HEALTH; TIME; INTERVENTION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/aft145
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: Dementia is common and often undiagnosed. Improving rates of diagnosis has become a key part of current dementia guidelines. Older people admitted to hospital are a potential target population for screening for dementia. The objective was to report whether instruments advocated in screening for dementia had been validated in hospital inpatients and to make recommendations on evidence-based screening for dementia in this population. Design: a systematic review was performed by an initial electronic database search using three key search criteria. Studies were then selected in a systematic fashion using specific predetermined criteria. Pooled meta-analysis was performed. Inclusion criteria were studies where the study group were inpatients in general hospitals, including a clearly defined group of older people (60 or older), they used a recognised screening instrument compared with a reference standard, and included at least 10 cases of dementia. Demographic data as well as sensitivity and specificity were recorded from the selected studies. Results: in total nine studies describing validation of six discreet instruments satisfied all our criteria and we were able to perform meta-analysis with one instrument, the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). With a cut-off of < 7, pooled analysis of the AMTS showed a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 84% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88. Conclusion: a small number of instruments have been validated for screening for dementia in general hospital. Understanding strengths and weaknesses of currently available instruments allows informed decisions about screening in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 695
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening for Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Prutsky, Gabriela J.
    Pablo Domecq, Juan
    Sundaresh, Vishnu
    Elraiyah, Tarig
    Nabhan, Mohammed
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Vella, Adrian
    Montori, Victor M.
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2013, 98 (11): : 4311 - 4318
  • [42] Screening for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peirson L.
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis D.
    Ciliska D.
    Warren R.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 2 (1)
  • [43] Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Miller, John
    Peirson, Leslea
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Kenny, Meghan
    Sherifali, Diana
    Raina, Parminder
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 89 : 301 - 314
  • [44] Gastric cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Faria, Lidia
    Silva, Joao Carlos
    Rodriguez-Carrasco, Marta
    Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Libanio, Diogo
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 57 (10) : 1178 - 1188
  • [45] Iranian hospital efficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rezaei, Satar
    Hajizadeh, Mohammad
    Nouri, Bijan
    Ahmadi, Sina
    Rezaeian, Shahab
    Salimi, Yahya
    Karyani, Ali Kazemi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (02) : 385 - 397
  • [46] Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ruth E Collins
    Laureen M Lopez
    Theresa M Marteau
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 11
  • [47] Psoriatic arthritis screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iragorri, Nicolas
    Hazlewood, Glen
    Manns, Braden
    Danthurebandara, Vishva
    Spackman, Eldon
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 58 (04) : 692 - 707
  • [48] Is headache a risk factor for dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aurora Cermelli
    Fausto Roveta
    Lia Giorgis
    Silvia Boschi
    Alberto Grassini
    Fabio Ferrandes
    Chiara Lombardo
    Andrea Marcinnò
    Elisa Rubino
    Innocenzo Rainero
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2024, 45 : 1017 - 1030
  • [49] Prevalence and Trends of Dementia in Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, You Joung
    Han, Ji Won
    So, Yoon Seop
    Seo, Ji Young
    Kim, Ka Young
    Kim, Ki Woong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (07) : 903 - 912
  • [50] Effects of Ginkgo biloba in dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weinmann, Stefan
    Roll, Stephanie
    Schwarzbach, Christoph
    Vauth, Christoph
    Willich, Stefan N.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2010, 10