STAKEHOLDERS' ANALYSIS TOOLS TO SUPPORT THE OPEN INNOVATION PROCESS MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
de Paula, Istefani Carisio [1 ]
Yang, Samanta [1 ]
Korzenowski, Andre [1 ]
Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, BR-90046900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
stakeholder analysis; open innovation; collaborative innovation strategies; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DYNAMICS; STRATEGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Open Innovation (OI) is a strategy to buster R&D productivity that introduces business flexibility via an open approach, either to external ideas or to collaborative work. Considering that the OI concept changes the perception of value creation and raises the number of stakeholders that contribute to a single project, stakeholder analysis seems to be adequate to identify the network partners involved in a project for management purposes. The aim in this paper is to propose a set of tools for stakeholder analysis directed to the identification, prioritization and categorization of stakeholders in an OI management environment. The tools were tested, based on a qualitative approach, in a case study in the Brazilian Pharmaceutical industry. The study led to the understanding of the relationships' importance and correlation of stakeholders in four representative pharmaceutical organizations that adhered to the OI strategy. The set of tools were useful to access the incoherence between the importance attributed to a given stakeholder and the kind of collaboration he shares. It revealed that the intensity of the relationships between them is different from a company to another.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adopting an Open Innovation Program with Supply Chain Management in China: A Case Study
    Lau, Antonio K. W.
    Lee, Leo W. Y.
    Lai, Kee-Hung
    Lee, Peter K. C.
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (01) : 24 - 41
  • [22] The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms
    Barham, Husam
    Dabic, Marina
    Daim, Tugrul
    Shifrer, Dara
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 63
  • [23] An integrated approach to decision support for maintenance management: a case study for machine tools
    Fornasiero, Rosanna
    Zangiacomi, Andrea
    Panarese, Daniele
    Cassina, Jacopo
    Taisch, Marco
    PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT: ASSESSING THE INDUSTRIAL RELEVANCE, 2007, : 791 - +
  • [24] Case Study: Efficient Algorithms for Air Traffic Management Decision Support Tools
    John, Sabrina
    John, Kai Lothar
    2015 WORKSHOP ON SENSOR DATA FUSION - TRENDS, SOLUTIONS, APPLICATIONS (SDF), 2015,
  • [25] DIGITAL TOOLS FOR ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF ENTERPRISES: INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT ASPECT
    Prodanchuk, Mykhailo
    Dankevych, Andrii
    Aksonova, Oksana
    Tomchuk, Olena
    ECONOMICS ECOLOGY SOCIUM, 2023, 7 (04): : 27 - 39
  • [26] Learning Communities as support for a Knowledge and Innovation Management System. A case study
    Gutierrez, Angel
    Lleras, Ernesto
    Diaz, Julia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SOCIAL JUSTICE AND PEACE, 2018, 6 (01): : 7 - 25
  • [27] Communities of learning as support for one knowledge and innovation management system: A case study
    Gutierrez, Angel
    Lleras, Ernesto
    Diaz, Julia
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2021, 38 (04) : 527 - 536
  • [28] Open innovation management and the allocation of technological innovation resources: a case in China
    Chen, J
    Chen, YF
    2005 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 756 - 759
  • [29] Digitalising and visualising innovation process: comparative analysis of digital tools supporting innovation process in SMEs
    Zaverzhenets, Maksym
    Lobacz, Katarzyna
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 3805 - 3814
  • [30] Analysis of Open-Source CASE Tools for Supporting Software Modeling Process with UML
    Silva Freire, Emmanuel Savio
    Oliveira, Gabriel Cavalcante
    de Sousa Gomes, Maria Eurizene
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE QUALITY (SBQS), 2015, : 51 - 60