Cognitive effects of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: evaluation at 1 and 6 years

被引:19
|
作者
Heber, Ines A. [1 ]
Coenen, Volker A. [2 ]
Reetz, Kathrin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Schulz, Joerg B. [3 ,4 ]
Hoellig, Anke [6 ]
Fimm, Bruno [1 ]
Kronenbuerger, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Div Neuropsychol, Dept Neurol, D-52064 Aachen, Germany
[2] Freiburg Univ Hosp, Dept Stereotact & Funct Neurosurg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[4] JARA, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[5] Res Ctr Julich GmbH, Inst Neurosci & Med, D-52428 Julich, Germany
[6] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, D-52064 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways; Neuropsychological functioning; Simple reaction time; Frontal cortex; PRIMATE MOTOR THALAMUS; PERFORMANCE; PROJECTIONS; MOVEMENT; OUTCOMES; NUCLEUS; CORTEX; MEMORY; MONKEY;
D O I
10.1007/s00702-013-1030-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Only a few studies have explored cognitive changes with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). Furthermore, the cognitive effects after years of electrical stimulation are unknown. Assessing the impact of stereotactic electrode implantation and the actual electrical stimulation on cognition in patients with ET in the short and long term is of interest, because DBS is increasingly applied and can offer deeper insight into human brain functions. We examined nine ET patients before surgery (PRE-SURGERY), and 1 and 6 years thereafter with DBS switched on (DBS-ON) and off (DBS-OFF). Standardized neuropsychological tests and reaction time tests were applied. There were no differences in tasks of verbal fluency, memory, and executive and intellectual functions comparing PRE-SURGERY, DBS-ON, and DBS-OFF at 1 and 6 years post-surgery. Imaging data revealed that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and mamillo-thalamic tracts crucial for cognitive functioning were spared by electrode implantation. Additionally, with electrodes targeting the thalamus and adjacent subthalamic area, the actual electrical stimulation did not affect neuropsychological functioning. However, lesions caused by electrode implantation led to an increase in simple reaction time, while the actual electrical stimulation restored impaired reaction time. This is the second largest study of neuropsychological functioning in patients with ET treated with DBS, and the first covering a neuropsychological long-term follow-up over 6 years. Neither stereotactic surgery nor electrical stimulation affected higher cognitive processes. This study proposes that cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways in humans are involved in tasks of simple reaction time.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1577
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor Also Reduces Voice Tremor
    Kundu, Bornali
    Schrock, Lauren
    Davis, Tyler
    House, Paul A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2018, 21 (08): : 748 - 754
  • [42] Outcomes with VIM deep brain stimulation in dystonic tremor versus essential tremor
    Tsuboi, Takashi
    Jabarkheel, Zakia
    Foote, Kelly
    Okun, Michael
    Shukla, Aparna Wagle
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [43] Changes in Midline Tremor and Gait Following Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor
    Higuchi, Masa-aki
    Roemmich, Ryan T.
    Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel
    Roper, Jaimie A.
    Zukowski, Lisa A.
    Foote, Kelly D.
    Okun, Michael S.
    Hass, Chris J.
    TREMOR AND OTHER HYPERKINETIC MOVEMENTS, 2019, 9 : 1 - 6
  • [44] Psychogenic tremor occurring after deep brain stimulation surgery for essential tremor
    McKeon, Andrew
    Ahlskog, J. Eric
    Matsumoto, Joseph Y.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (16) : 1498 - 1499
  • [45] Thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor in Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and dystonia
    Cury, Rubens Gisbert
    Fraix, Valerie
    Castrioto, Anna
    Fernandez, Maricely Ambar Perez
    Krack, Paul
    Chabardes, Stephan
    Seigneuret, Eric
    Alho, Eduardo Joaquim Lopes
    Benabid, Alim-Louis
    Moro, Elena
    NEUROLOGY, 2017, 89 (13) : 1416 - 1423
  • [46] Incidence of waning tremor control in essential tremor patients with deep brain stimulation
    Seier, M. D.
    Hiller, A.
    Murchison, C.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2016, 31 : S322 - S322
  • [47] Differentiating Postural and Kinetic Tremor Responses to Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor
    Butler, Rebecca D.
    Brinda, Annemarie K.
    Blumenfeld, Madeline
    Bryants, Marina N.
    Grund, Peter M.
    Pandey, Shivansh R.
    Cornish, Chelsea K. S.
    Sullivan, Disa
    Krieg, Jordan
    Umoh, Matthew
    Vitek, Jerrold L.
    Almeida, Leonardo
    Orcutt, Tseganesh
    Cooper, Scott E.
    Johnson, Matthew D.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [48] Steady or not following thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
    Hwynn, Nelson
    Hass, Christopher J.
    Zeilman, Pamela
    Romrell, Janet
    Dai, Yunfeng
    Wu, Sam S.
    Foote, Kelly D.
    Subramony, S. H.
    Oyama, Genko
    Velez-Lago, Frances
    Fernandez, Hubert H.
    Resnick, Andrew S.
    Malaty, Irene A.
    Okun, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 258 (09) : 1643 - 1648
  • [49] Bipolar Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential and Parkinsonian Tremor
    Steffen, Julia K.
    Reker, Paul
    Mennicken, Fiona K.
    Dembek, Till A.
    Dafsari, Haidar S.
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
    Barbe, Michael T.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (04): : 543 - 549
  • [50] Age of Onset and Deep Brain Stimulation in a Cohort of Essential Tremor
    Jamal, Fariha
    Sarwar, Aliya
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)