Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation

被引:90
|
作者
Baumfeld, Joshua A. [3 ]
Diduch, David R. [1 ]
Rubino, L. Joseph [4 ]
Hart, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Miller, Mark D. [1 ]
Barr, Michelle S. [2 ]
Hart, Joseph M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Radiol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Lahey Clin Fdn, Boston, MA USA
[4] Wright State Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
关键词
ACL reconstruction; Graft fixation; Osteolysis; Tunnel widening;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-008-0606-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft has been described. Greater tunnel widening has been reported with suspensory fixation systems. We hypothesized that greater tunnel widening will be observed in patients whose hamstring autograft was fixated using a cortical, suspensory system, compared to double cross-pin fixation on the femur. We performed clinical and radiographic evaluation on 46 patients at minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. We measured subjective and objective outcomes including KT-1000 and AP, lateral radiographs. A musculoskeletal radiologist, independent of the surgical team, measured tunnel width, while correcting for magnification, at the widest point and at 1 cm away from tibial and femoral tunnel apertures. Patients in the suspensory graft fixation group exhibited significantly greater absolute change and greater percent change in femoral tunnel diameter compared to patients with double cross-pin fixation (P <= 0.05). This difference was noted on both AP and lateral radiographs and at both measurement sites. There was no significant difference between groups for tibial tunnel widening, IKDC subjective scores or KT-1000 side to side differences. There was significantly more femoral tunnel widening associated with the use of the endobutton suspensory fixation system compared to the use of double cross-pins for fixation within the tunnel.
引用
收藏
页码:1108 / 1113
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biosteon Cross Pin Femoral Fixation and Tibial Interference Screw Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Stewart, Andrew M.
    Paulos, Lonnie E.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [42] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft with interference screw fixation
    Moisala, A. -S.
    Jaervelae, T.
    Honkonen, S.
    Paakkala, A.
    Kannus, P.
    Jaervinen, M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 96 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [43] Cortical Button Versus Cross-pin Femoral Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jiang, Hai
    Ma, Guangzhi
    Li, Qi
    Hu, Yanqing
    Li, Jian
    Tang, Xin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (09): : 2277 - 2284
  • [44] Correlation Between Endobutton Loop Length and Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Choi, Nam-Hong
    Oh, Jong-Seok
    Jung, Seok-Hyun
    Victoroff, Brian N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01): : 101 - 106
  • [45] Is bone tunnel osseointegration in hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction important?
    Logan, M
    Williams, A
    Myers, P
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (08):
  • [46] Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Putnis, Sven E.
    Oshima, Takeshi
    Klasan, Antonio
    Grasso, Samuel
    Fritsch, Brett A.
    Coolican, Myles R. J.
    Parker, David A.
    KNEE, 2021, 28 : 1 - 8
  • [47] Femoral Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bioabsorbable Transfix
    Choi, Nam-Hong
    Son, Kyung-Mo
    Yoo, Soon-Young
    Victoroff, Brian N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (02): : 383 - 387
  • [48] Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature
    Sr, Byron Chalidis
    Pitsilos, Charalampos
    Pavlopoulos, Charalampos
    Papadopoulos, Polychronis
    Gigis, Ioannis
    Papadopoulos, Periklis
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [49] Femoral Cross-Pin Safety in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Function of Femoral Tunnel Position and Insertion Angle
    Krupp, Ryan
    Scovell, Field
    Cook, Chad
    Nyland, John
    Wyland, Doug
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (01): : 83 - 88
  • [50] Comparison of proprioception recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an artificial graft versus an autograft
    Changli Xu
    Tianze Liu
    Miao Wang
    Chang Liu
    Bo Li
    Qiujian Lian
    Tongjiang Chen
    Fengmei Chen
    Suchi Qiao
    Zhiwei Wang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23