Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Otolaryngology Emergency Room Using a Contingent Valuation Approach

被引:6
|
作者
Naunheim, Matthew R. [1 ,2 ]
Kozin, Elliot D. [1 ,2 ]
Sethi, Rosh K. [1 ,2 ]
Ota, H. Gregory [1 ,2 ]
Gray, Stacey T. [1 ,2 ]
Shrime, Mark G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otol & Laryngol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA USA
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; contingent valuation; willingness to pay; emergency services; specialty emergency rooms; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; HEALTH-CARE-DELIVERY; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PAYMENT SCALE; ENT PROBLEMS; MODEL; QUALITY; COMMUNITY; CONTRACT;
D O I
10.1177/0194599815596742
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives Dedicated otolaryngology emergency rooms (ERs) provide a unique mechanism of health care delivery. Relative costs and willingness to pay (WTP) for these services have not been studied. This study aims to provide a cost-benefit analysis of otolaryngology-specific ER care. Study Design Cost-benefit analysis based on contingent valuation surveys. Setting An otolaryngology-specific ER in a tertiary care academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Adult English-speaking patients presenting to an otolaryngology ER were included. WTP questions were used to assess patient valuations of specialty emergency care. Sociodemographic data, income, and self-reported levels of distress were assessed. State-level and institution-specific historical cost data were merged with WTP data within a cost-benefit analysis framework. Results The response rate was 75.6%, and 199 patients were included in the final analysis. Average WTP for otolaryngology ER services was $319 greater than for a general ER (95% CI: $261 to $377), with a median value of $200. The historical mean cost per visit at a general ER was $575, and mean cost at the specialty ER was $551 (95% CI: $529 to $574). Subtracting incremental cost from incremental WTP yielded a net benefit of $343. Conclusion Dedicated otolaryngology ER services are valued by patients for acute otolaryngologic problems and have a net benefit of $343 per patient visit. They appear to be a cost-beneficial method for addressing acute otolaryngologic conditions. This study has implications for ER-based otolaryngologic care and direct-to-specialist services.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A National Survey of the Perceived Monetary Value of Public Library Service for Norwegians: Contingent Valuation Approach Reveals a 1: 4 Cost-Benefit Ratio
    Hall, Stephanie
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2007, 2 (01): : 128 - 130
  • [42] Environmental Cost of Groundwater: A contingent Valuation Approach
    Martinez-Paz, J. M.
    Perni, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (03) : 603 - 612
  • [43] Cost-benefit of medical emergency motorcycle system
    Fink, A.
    Andoljsek, D.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 51 (04) : 514 - 515
  • [44] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [45] Analysis of antimicrobial use and cost-benefit rationality in medical emergency department
    Jia, Lijing
    Cui, Wei
    Tang, Shaoqing
    Xiu, Yuanyuan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (03) : 1047 - 1051
  • [46] Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Medical Emergency Team in a Children's Hospital
    Bonafide, Christopher P.
    Localio, A. Russell
    Song, Lihai
    Roberts, Kathryn E.
    Nadkarni, Vinay M.
    Priestley, Margaret
    Paine, Christine W.
    Zander, Miriam
    Lutts, Meaghan
    Brady, Patrick W.
    Keren, Ron
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [47] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [48] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [49] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [50] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40