Systematic detection and repair of subclinical inguinal hernias at radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:62
|
作者
Nielsen, ME [1 ]
Walsh, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Inguinal hernias occur in 15% of men within 1 to 2 years after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). This suggests that many of these hernias may have been present at surgery, but not diagnosed. Beginning in September 2001, all patients undergoing RRP were carefully examined intraoperatively for the presence of a hernia or a dilated internal inguinal ring. In this study we define the frequency of inguinal hernias detected at RRP and the durability of repair. Methods. Between September 2001 and December 2004, 430 patients underwent RRP by one surgeon. Hernias, detected in 142 men (33%), were repaired preperitoneally: direct hernias were repaired with mesh and indirect hernias with 2-0 Prolene suture. The patients were followed up for an average of 19 months (range 9 to 36). Information on postoperative hernia status was available for 315 men (73.3%). Results. Of the 430 patients, 142 (33%) had hernias repaired at RRP. Of these hernias, 32% were right sided, 28% left sided, and 40% bilateral; 34% were direct hernias and 66% indirect. Of the 142 patients who underwent intraoperative hernia repair, 95 (67%) had follow-up data, and 5 (5.3%) of that group developed a hernia postoperatively. None of the hernias repaired at RRP recurred. Recurrent hernias on the side of the repair occurred in 3.1%. Conclusions. Incidental inguinal hernias were commonly found (33%) at RRP. Two thirds of the defects detected were indirect. Clinical recurrence after repair was rare.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1037
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Concurrent Repair of Inguinal Hernias with Mesh Application During Transperitoneal Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is it Safe?
    Atmaca, Ali Fuat
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Keske, Murat
    Ardicoglu, Arslan
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (06) : 381 - 386
  • [32] The incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia occurring after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Um, J
    Song, SH
    Jeong, SJ
    Lee, E
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 518 - 518
  • [33] Simple Method of Preventing Postoperative Inguinal Hernia After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Yasui, Takahiro
    Kubota, Hiroki
    Fukuta, Katsuhiro
    Kobayashi, Daichi
    Naruyama, Hiromichi
    Okada, Atsushi
    Yamada, Yasuyuki
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) : 1083 - 1087
  • [34] Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia at open radical prostatectomy
    I. L. Savetsky
    F. Rabbani
    K. Singh
    M. S. Brady
    Hernia, 2009, 13 : 517 - 522
  • [35] Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia at open radical prostatectomy
    Savetsky, I. L.
    Rabbani, F.
    Singh, K.
    Brady, M. S.
    HERNIA, 2009, 13 (05) : 517 - 522
  • [36] Concurrent inguinal hernia repair and radical retropubic prostatectomy through a single modified Pfannenstiel incision: 3 year experience
    Manoharan, M
    Nieder, A
    Vyas, S
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 518 - 518
  • [37] The incidence of inguinal hernia occurrence at the time of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy and the outcome of a policy of repair of all identified hernias
    Harewood, L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 18 - 18
  • [38] Open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Pereira, Ryan
    Joshi, Andre
    Roberts, Matthew
    Yaxley, John
    Vela, Ian
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3025 - 3035
  • [39] Radical retropubic prostatectomy - Comment
    Jakse, G
    UROLOGE A, 2004, 43 (06): : 721 - 721
  • [40] Laparoscopic repair of rectal bladder fistula after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Parma, Paolo
    Samuelli, Alessandro
    Dall'Oglio, Bruno
    Cappellaro, Livio
    Bondavalli, Candido
    De Luca, Francesco
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2011, 78 : S21 - S25