Sustainable Urban Development Calls for Responsibility through Life Cycle Management

被引:2
|
作者
Ristimaki, Miro [1 ]
Junnila, Seppo [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Real Estate Planning & Geoinformat, Espoo 02150, Finland
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2015年 / 7卷 / 09期
关键词
urban development; urban sustainability; life cycle management; sustainability; life cycle assessment; life cycle approach; INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS; FRAMEWORK; NEIGHBORHOOD; CONSTRUCTION; CHALLENGES; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/su70912539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban development bestows a great opportunity to increase sustainability in the built environment as cities are responsible for the majority of environmental impacts. However, the urban development process is fragmented and sub-optimization leads to unsustainable life cycle outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine the urban development process from a life cycle perspective and identify how different actors understand life cycle management. By utilizing an inductive qualitative research design, 38 in-depth thematic interviews were conducted within the Finnish urban development industry including a case study and independent interviews from different phases of the urban development life cycle. The theoretical perspective is a combination of the ecosystem construct and life cycle management. Results show that there is no clear responsible actor for life cycle management in urban development. All actors claim that there is value to be added, mostly in economic, but also environmental and social terms. This study reveals that investors should be the responsible actor in the urban development process. By claiming responsibility and focusing on life cycle leadership we can improve sustainability in urban development, and respond to the urban sustainability challenge, thus improving the quality of life and welfare in our urban society.
引用
收藏
页码:12539 / 12563
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainable wastewater management: life cycle assessment of conventional and source-separating urban sanitation systems
    Remy, C.
    Jekel, M.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (08) : 1555 - 1562
  • [32] Exploring sustainable and cost-effective wastewater management solutions for urban India through life cycle cost analysis: a case study approach
    Minde, Pravin
    Patil, Jagruti
    Patil, Monika
    Singh, Navin
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2024, 235 (06):
  • [33] Life Cycle costing — paving the road to sustainable development?
    David Hunkeler
    Gerald Rebitzer
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 109 - 110
  • [34] Introduction to innovation in life cycle engineering and sustainable development
    [J]. Innov. Life Cycle Eng. Sustainable Dev., 2006, (ix-x):
  • [35] Life cycle sustainability assessment for sustainable development goals
    Yao, Yuan
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Feng, Haibo
    Arodudu, Oludunsin
    Gloria, Thomas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 28 (06) : 1347 - 1354
  • [36] The electricity capacities’ Life cycle assessment for a sustainable development
    Aureliu Leca
    Serena Adler
    Otilia Rodica Marin
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 (3) : 184 - 184
  • [37] Life-cycle assessment and sustainable development indicators
    Cooper, Joyce Smith
    [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2003, 7 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [38] A review of studies on sustainable development in mining life cycle
    Asr, Elmira Tajvidi
    Kakaie, Reza
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza Tavakoli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 213 - 231
  • [39] Life cycle costing - Paving the road to sustainable development?
    Hunkeler, D
    Rebitzer, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (02): : 109 - 110
  • [40] Life cycle analysis for sustainable development: Panel 1
    Moore, Karen
    Young, Felicia
    Curran, Mary Anne
    Elter, John F.
    [J]. Technology, 2002, 8 (4-6): : 301 - 308