Aortic valve-sparing operations in aortic root aneurysms: remodeling or reimplantation?

被引:28
|
作者
Rahnavardi, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Tristan D. [1 ,2 ]
Bannon, Paul G. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Michael K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Baird Inst Appl Heart & Lung Surg Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Aortic valve-sparing operation; Remodeling; Reimplantation; Aortic root aneurysm; ASCENDING AORTA; MARFAN-SYNDROME; REPLACEMENT; SURGERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1510/icvts.2011.267401
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the reimplantation (David) technique or the remodeling (Yacoub) technique provides the optimum event free survival in patients with an aortic root aneurysm suitable for an aortic valve-sparing operation. In total, 392 papers were found using the reported search criteria, of which 14 papers provided the best evidence to answer the clinical question. A total of 1338 patients (Yacoub technique in 606 and David technique in 732) from 13 centres were included. In most series, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time were longer for the David technique compared to the Yacoub technique. Early mortality was comparable between the two techniques (0-6.9% for the Yacoub technique and 0-6% for the David technique). There is a tendency for a higher freedom from significant long-term aortic insufficiency in the David group than the Yacoub group, which does not necessarily result in a higher reoperation rate in the Yacoub group. In the largest series reported, freedom from a moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency at 12 years was 82.6 +/- 6.2% in the Yacoub and 91.0 +/- 3.8% in the David group (P = 0.035). Freedom from reoperation at the same time point was 90.4 +/- 4.7% in the Yacoub group and 97.4 +/- 2.2% in the David group (P = 0.09). In another series, freedom from reoperation at a follow-up time of about four years was 89 +/- 4% in the Yacoub group and 98 +/- 2% in the David group. Although some authors merely preferred the Yacoub technique for a bicuspid aortic valve, the accumulated evidence in the current review indicates comparable results for both techniques in a bicuspid aortic valve. Current evidence is in favour of the David rather than the Yacoub technique in pathologies such as Marfan syndrome, acute type A aortic dissection, and excessive annular dilatation that may impair aortic root integrity. Careful selection of patients for each technique and successful restoration of normal cusp geometry are the keys to success in aortic valve-sparing operations. (C) 2011 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm
    David, Tirone E.
    Feindel, Christopher M.
    Webb, Gary D.
    Colman, Jack M.
    Armstrong, Susan
    Maganti, Manjula
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 132 (02): : 347 - 353
  • [42] Failures of Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement Using the Root Remodeling Technique
    Giebels, Christian
    Fister, Julia-Carolin
    Ehrlich, Tristan
    Federspiel, Jan
    Schaefers, Hans-Joachim
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 113 (06): : 2000 - 2006
  • [43] Should the annulus be fixed in aortic valve-sparing root replacement with remodeling?
    Furukawa, Kojiro
    Kamohara, Keiji
    Yunoki, Junji
    Koga, Shugo
    Itoh, Manabu
    Morokuma, Hiroyuki
    Mukae, Yosuke
    Itoh, Tsuyoshi
    Morita, Shigeki
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (04) : 200 - 205
  • [44] Correction to: Valve-sparing aortic root surgery. CON: remodeling
    Takashi Kunihara
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 66 : 179 - 181
  • [45] Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: Comparison of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus composite grafting
    Karck, M
    Kallenbach, K
    Hagl, C
    Rhein, C
    Leyh, R
    Haverich, A
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 127 (02): : 391 - 398
  • [46] Should the annulus be fixed in aortic valve-sparing root replacement with remodeling?
    Kojiro Furukawa
    Keiji Kamohara
    Junji Yunoki
    Shugo Koga
    Manabu Itoh
    Hiroyuki Morokuma
    Yosuke Mukae
    Tsuyoshi Itoh
    Shigeki Morita
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2017, 65 : 200 - 205
  • [47] A new aortic root prosthesis with compliant sinuses for valve-sparing operations
    Thubrikar, MJ
    Robicsek, F
    Gong, GG
    Fowler, BL
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (05): : S318 - S322
  • [48] Valve sparing root replacement: reimplantation of the aortic valve
    Aphram, Gaby
    Tamer, Saadallah
    Mastrobuoni, Stefano
    El Khoury, Gebrine
    de Kerchove, Laurent
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 8 (03) : 415 - 417
  • [49] Aortic root replacement with a valve-sparing technique for quadricuspid aortic valve
    Yamanaka, Katsuhiro
    Okada, Kenji
    Okita, Yutaka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 47 (04) : 741 - 743
  • [50] Commentary: Nothing lasts forever, including valve-sparing root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve
    Lau, Christopher
    Girardi, Leonard N.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 161 (03): : 900 - 901