Camera trap research in Africa: A systematic review to show trends in wildlife monitoring and its value as a research tool

被引:17
|
作者
Cordier, Craig P. [1 ]
Smith, David A. Ehlers [1 ]
Smith, Yvette Ehlers [1 ,2 ]
Downs, Colleen T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Funct Biodivers, Sch Life Sci, Private Bag X01, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[2] Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, POB 13053, Cascades, ZA-3202 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Camera traps; Monitor wildlife; Terrestrial wildlife; Large carnivore; Forest; Protocols; BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT; DENSITY-ESTIMATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; FENCE-GAPS; FOREST; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; OCCUPANCY; MAMMALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02326
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Camera traps have been used increasingly as a research tool to monitor wildlife globally, and have become more advanced, thereby improving their performance and lowering costs. Their use has allowed researchers to study a range of species, including rare and elusive species, particularly in remote areas, in a non-invasive, reliable and cost-effective way. In this review, we sought to document the camera trapping research on terrestrial wildlife conducted in Africa, identifying countries and habitat types of focus, and how these camera trap research trends in Africa could be improved in the future. Through a systematic literature search, we found 408 peer-reviewed publications using camera traps to study terrestrial wildlife in Africa, with the first being in 2005 and up to 2021. Although camera trap studies were conducted in 38 African countries, most were in South Africa (28.9 %). Most studies assessed the occupancy of species (41.4 %). The studies covered a range of taxa, with mammals being the most popular. The majority of research focussed on large carnivores (24.8 %), with a particular focus on leopards (Panthera pardus) (60 studies). Most studies (43.9 %) focused on a single species, with forests (174 studies, 42.6 %) and savannah/bushveld (145 studies, 35.5 %) being the habitat type of focus. There was also a strong preference for camera trap studies to be conducted in protected areas (68.9 %). The camera trap methods used varied considerably between studies, which included: the number of camera trap stations, survey length, trap effort, camera trap make and model, camera trap flash type, interval delay, camera multishot, height of camera trap placement, camera trap layout method and whether the camera trap was baited. These variations are expected because of the difference in research goals posed by each study. However, studies with similar objectives and/or focus still display a clear lack of standardisation (studies do not conform to a specific standard), which could negatively impact the results obtained, as inappropriate camera trap protocols could affect the detectability of certain species. Future camera trap studies will hopefully extend to countries and taxa that have received little attention, with further research informing appropriate conservation strategies that could reduce the threats to biodiversity.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of the ultimate camera trap for wildlife research and monitoring
    Meek, Paul D.
    Pittet, Andre
    CAMERA TRAPPING: WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, : 101 - 109
  • [2] A review of wildlife camera trapping trends across Africa
    Agha, Mickey
    Batter, Tom
    Bolas, Ellen
    Collins, Amy
    da Rocha, Daniel
    Monteza-Moreno, Claudia
    Preckler-Quisquater, Sophie
    Sollmann, Rahel
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2018, 56 (04) : 694 - 701
  • [3] User-based design specifications for the ultimate camera trap for wildlife research
    Meek, P. D.
    Pittet, A.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (08) : 649 - 660
  • [4] WiseEye: Next Generation Expandable and Programmable Camera Trap Platform for Wildlife Research
    Nazir, Sajid
    Newey, Scott
    Irvine, R. Justin
    Verdicchio, Fabio
    Davidson, Paul
    Fairhurst, Gorry
    van der Wal, Rene
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [5] Trends in Glucocerebrosides Research: A Systematic Review
    Desplanque, Mazarine
    Bonte, Marie-Amandine
    Gressier, Bernard
    Devos, David
    Chartier-Harlin, Marie-Christine
    Belarbi, Karim
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [6] Camera trap theft and vandalism: occurrence, cost, prevention and implications for wildlife research and management
    Meek, Paul D.
    Ballard, Guy A.
    Sparkes, Jess
    Robinson, Mark
    Nesbitt, Brad
    Fleming, Peter J. S.
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 5 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [7] "Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications
    Rovero, Francesco
    Zimmermann, Fridolin
    Berzi, Duccio
    Meek, Paul
    HYSTRIX-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2013, 24 (02): : 148 - 156
  • [8] CARACAL: a versatile passive acoustic monitoring tool for wildlife research and conservation
    Wijers, Matthew
    Loveridge, Andrew
    Macdonald, David W.
    Markham, Andrew
    BIOACOUSTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SOUND AND ITS RECORDING, 2021, 30 (01): : 41 - 57
  • [9] Research Trends of Hydrological Drought: A Systematic Review
    Hasan, Hasrul Hazman
    Razali, Siti Fatin Mohd
    Muhammad, Nur Shazwani
    Ahmad, Asmadi
    WATER, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [10] Trends in dengue research in the Philippines: A systematic review
    An Agrupis, Kristal
    Ylade, Michelle
    Aldaba, Josephine
    Lena Lopez, Anna
    Deen, Jacqueline
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2019, 13 (04):