The influence of wind speed and spray nozzle geometry on the drift of chlorpyrifos to surface water

被引:0
|
作者
Pepper, TJ [1 ]
Arnold, DJ [1 ]
Murray, C [1 ]
Reeves, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] ADAS Boxworth, Cambridge Environm Assessments, Cambridge CB3 8NN, England
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Under the Plant Protection Product (PPP) Authorisations Directive (91/414/EEC) the risk of a PPP to off-crop non-target aquatic organisms is assessed in a tiered approach. From the properties and use pattern of the product, the likely routes of entry into surface water are assessed for PPPs applied as sprays. These assessments are based upon a calculated percentage of the active substance being deposited on a static body of water, 30cm deep, related to the distance from the end of the spray boom to the edge of the water body (Ganzelmeier et al. 1995). For some PPPs, such as chlorpyrifos, a buffer (no spray zone) may be applied to "in use" situations to reduce drift off-crop. However, there is little data to demonstrate how well drift events with specific chemicals match Ganzelmeier data or the extent to which application factors such as wind speed and spray nozzle affect the degree and amount of drift. Using a large-scale wind tunnel, a series of controlled, replicated studies were carried out to measure the influence of two wind speeds in combination with a conventional and three star (UK) rated reduced drift nozzle on the spray drift of chlorpyrifos, applied as Dursban 4, and its deposition on to an artificial ditch, simulating a static edge of field water body, 30cm deep. Results showed a clear reduction in amounts of chlorpyrifos as distance from the nozzle increased. The combination of 3mph (low) wind speed and low drift nozzle had a significant influence in reducing drift by ca. ten-fold at 2m from the spray nozzle, and five-fold at the mid-ditch position (4.5 or 5m), as measured by polyethylene strings stretched horizontally across the path of the drift. Water concentrations were reduced by ca. half from an average of 1. 11 mug L-1 to 0.45mug L-1 The presence of a 50cm artificial bank had no significant influence on the concentration of chlorpyrifos in surface water. Results show that both low wind speed and low drift nozzle can contribute to risk reduction of certain PPPs in surface water.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 410
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of the nozzle geometry on spray-dried particle formation expanding superheated suspensions
    Monse, K
    Linnepe, T
    Groom, S
    Walzel, P
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 26 (10) : 1044 - 1046
  • [22] The Influence of Wind Speed and Atomization Degree on Distribution of Liquid Fall under the Nozzle
    Szewczyk, Antoni
    Luczycka, Deta
    Cieniawska, Beata
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2015, 24 (02): : 701 - 706
  • [23] Evaluation of spray drift using low-speed wind tunnel measurements and dispersion modeling
    Fritz, Bradley K.
    Clint Hoffmann, W.
    Birchfield, Norman B.
    Ellenberger, Jay
    Khan, Faruque
    Bagley, W.E.
    Thornburg, Jonathan W.
    Hewitt, Andrew
    [J]. Journal of ASTM International, 2010, 7 (06):
  • [24] Influence of sea spray droplets on drag coefficient in high wind speed
    Shi Jian
    Zhou Lin
    Yang Long-Ying
    [J]. ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2013, 62 (03)
  • [25] Diesel nozzle geometry influence on spray liquid-phase fuel penetration in evaporative conditions
    Payri, R.
    Salvador, F. J.
    Gimeno, J.
    Zapata, L. D.
    [J]. FUEL, 2008, 87 (07) : 1165 - 1176
  • [26] Influence of Blockage Ratio on Nozzle Wind Speed Measurement Method in Open-Jet Wind Tunnel
    Jia, Qing
    Huang, Lei
    Ju, Shubin
    Yang, Zhigang
    [J]. Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2019, 47 (11): : 1641 - 1647
  • [27] Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods
    Nuyttens, D.
    Taylor, W. A.
    De Schampheleire, M.
    Verboven, P.
    Dekeyser, D.
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 103 (03) : 271 - 280
  • [28] Analysis of the spray field development on a vertical surface during water spray-quenching using a flat spray nozzle
    Vorster, W. J. J.
    Schwindt, S. A.
    Schupp, J.
    Korsunsky, A. M.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (07) : 1406 - 1416
  • [29] Are spray drift losses to agricultural roads more important for surface water contamination than direct drift to surface waters?
    Schonenberger, Urs T.
    Simon, Janine
    Stamm, Christian
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 809
  • [30] STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON THE MEASUREMENT OF SURFACE VELOCITY
    Roh, Y.
    Choi, K.
    [J]. 19TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA OCEANIA GEOSCIENCES SOCIETY, AOGS 2022, 2023, : 80 - 82