Evaluation of hydrological modeling using climatic station and gridded precipitation dataset

The conventional rainfall data estimates are relatively accurate at some points of the region. The interpolation of such type of data approximates the actual rainfield however in data scarce regions; the resulted rainfield is the rough estimate of the actual rainfall events. In data scarce regions like Indus basin Pakistan, the data obtained through remote sensing can be very useful. This research evaluates two types of gridded data i.e., European Reanalysis (ERA) interim and Japanese Reanalysis 55 years (JRA-55) along with the climatic station data for three small dams in Pakistan. Since no measured flow data is available at these dams, the nearest possible catchments where flow data is available are calibrated and the calibrated parameters of these catchments are then used in actual dams for simulating the flow from all the three types of data using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The results of the comparison of gridded and rainguage precipitation shows that gridded data highly overestimates the climatic station data. Similar results were observed in the comparison of flow simulated by SWAT model. The Peak flood calculated from JRA-55 overestimates while the Era-Interim peak floods are comparable to that of climatic stations in two of the three catchments.