共 50 条
- [41] When rules are more important than justice - Carlisle v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 1460 (1996) JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03): : 1040 - 1065
- [42] Denying Fifth Amendment protections to witnesses facing foreign prosecutions: Self-incrimination discrimination? United States v. Balsys, 118 S. Ct. 2218 (1998). JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1999, 89 (03): : 1095 - 1140
- [43] REMOVING CORPORATE CAMPAIGN FINANCE RESTRICTIONS IN Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. CT. 876 (2010) HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 34 (01): : 405 - 420
- [44] MACHINEGUNNING REASON: SENTENCING FACTORS AND MANDATORY MINIMUMS IN United States v. O'Brien, 130 S. CT. 2169 (2010) HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 34 (03): : 1131 - 1143
- [45] A sentence reinstated, a text set aside:: Shirking the Lockett dilemma in Ayers v. Belmontes, 127 S. Ct. 469 (2006) HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2007, 30 (03): : 1085 - 1096
- [46] A case for harmless error review of Ake errors - Tuggle v. Netherland, 116 S. Ct. 283 (1995) (per curiam) JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03): : 786 - 811
- [47] A MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION FOR ALL SEASONS: OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL V. MORRISSEY-BERRU, 140 S. CT. 2049 (2020) HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 45 (01): : 465 - 479
- [48] Avoiding Mead:: The problem with unanimity in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, 127 S. Ct. 2339 (2007) HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 31 (03): : 1183 - 1194
- [49] Changing tide tide of double jeopardy in the context of continuing criminal enterprise - Rutledge v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 1241 (1996) JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03): : 967 - 989
- [50] Protecting first Federal Habeas Corpus petitions: Closing the opening left by Gomez - Lonchar v. Thomas, 116 S. Ct. 1293 (1996) JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03): : 990 - 1015