Introduction, availability and role of simulation in surgical education and training: Review of current evidence and recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training

被引:96
|
作者
Milburn, J. A. [1 ]
Khera, G. [1 ]
Hornby, S. T. [1 ]
Malone, P. S. C. [1 ]
Fitzgerald, J. E. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Surg Training, London WC2A 3PE, England
关键词
Education; Training; Surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality; Laparoscopic; OPERATING-ROOM; LAPAROSCOPIC SKILLS; PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; CARE; BOX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The utility of simulation in surgical training is now well-established, with proven validity and demonstrable transfer of skills to the clinical setting. Through a reduction in the technical learning curve, simulation can prepare surgeons for actual practice and in doing so it has the potential to improve both patient safety and service efficiency. More broadly, multi-disciplinary simulation of the theatre environment can aid development of non-technical skills and assist in preparing theatre teams for infrequently encountered scenarios such as surgical emergencies. The role of simulation in the formal training curriculum is less well-established, and availability of facilities for this is currently unknown. This paper reviews the contemporary evidence supporting simulation in surgical training and reports trainee access to such capabilities. Our national surgical trainee survey with 1130 complete responses indicated only 41.2% had access to skills simulator facilities. Of those with access, 16.3% had availability out-of-hours and only 54.0% had local access (i. e. current work place). These results highlight the paucity in current provision of surgical skills simulator facilities, and availability (or awareness of availability) varies widely between region, grade and specialty. Based on these findings and current best-evidence, the Association of Surgeons in Training propose 22 action-points for the introduction, availability and role of simulation in surgical training. Adoption of these should guide trainers, trainees and training bodies alike to ensure equitable provision of appropriate equipment, time and resources to allow the full integration of simulation into the surgical curriculum. (C) 2012 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 398
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] eLogbook in surgical training: Time to embrace video? An invited commentary on "Use of the eLogbook in surgical training in the United Kingdom: A nationwide survey and consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training"
    Erridge, Simon
    Purkayastha, Sanjay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 77 : 114 - 115
  • [22] Emergency cross-cover of surgical specialties: Consensus recommendations by the Association of Surgeons in Training
    Wild, J. R. L.
    Lambert, G.
    Hornby, S.
    Fitzgerald, J. E. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (08) : 584 - 588
  • [23] Consensus recommendations on balancing educational opportunities and service provision in surgical training: Association of Surgeons in Training Delphi qualitative study
    Pucher, Philip H.
    Peckham-Cooper, Adam
    Fleming, Christina
    Mohamed, Walid
    Clements, Joshua Michael
    Nally, Deirdre
    Humm, Gemma
    Mohan, Helen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 84 : 207 - 211
  • [24] Structure and quality assurance of Fellowship Training in General Surgery: Consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training
    Fleming, Christina
    Pucher, Philip
    Elsey, Elizabeth
    Glasbey, James
    Conneely, John
    Hogan, Aisling
    Adair, Robert
    Lund, Jonathan
    Blencowe, Natalie
    Smith, Andrew
    Athanasiou, Christos
    Wong, Kelvin
    Egbuji, Ofuchi
    Latif, Aysha
    Bibi, Saira
    O'Connell, Emer
    Flanagan, Michael
    Thiyagarajan, Umasankar
    Kane, Elizabeth
    Baeiv, Yangi
    Koshy, Renol
    Sudarsanam, Abhilash
    Gray, Struvan
    Johnstone, Mark
    El Muntasar, Ahmed
    Adeyanzu, Adetunji
    Orizu, Mavis
    Mallya, Nisha
    Kotecha, Sita
    Daliya, Prita
    Byrne, Ben E.
    Leighton, Pippa
    Oliphant, Zoe
    Clement, Kieran
    Scrimgeour, Duncan
    Holroyd, David
    Doe, Matthew
    Griffiths, Shelly
    Chambers, Alice
    Tham, Ji
    Arunachalam, Priya
    O'Callaghan, John
    Bellini, Maria Irene
    Pereca, Jelizaveta
    Hoq, Oram
    Sagar, Peter
    Begaj, Ardit
    Humm, Gemma
    Williams, Adam
    Thaventhiran, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 67 : 101 - 106
  • [25] Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
    James, H. K.
    Chapman, A. W.
    Pattison, G. T. R.
    Griffin, D. R.
    Fisher, J. D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (13) : 1726 - 1734
  • [26] Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education
    Bashankaev, Badma
    Baido, Sergey
    Wexner, Steven D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [27] ROLE AND VALUE OF SIMULATION IN PLASTIC SURGERY EDUCATION AND TRAINING: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
    Nel, C. P. G.
    Labuschagne, M. J.
    Van Zyl, G. J.
    JOURNAL FOR NEW GENERATION SCIENCES, 2021, 19 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [28] Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education
    Badma Bashankaev
    Sergey Baido
    Steven D. Wexner
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 28 - 35
  • [29] A commentary on: "Consensus recommendations on balancing educational opportunities and service provision in surgical training: Association of Surgeons in Training Delphi qualitative study"
    Beamish, Andrew J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 79 : 8 - 9
  • [30] To the point: medical education review of the role of simulators in surgical training
    Hammoud, Maya M.
    Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
    Goepfert, Alice R.
    Casey, Petra M.
    Emmons, Sandra
    Espey, Eve L.
    Kaczmarczyk, Joseph M.
    Katz, Nadine T.
    Neutens, James J.
    Peskin, Edward G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) : 338 - 343