Comparisons of fresh complex impact craters on Mercury and the Moon: Implications for controlling factors in impact excavation processes

被引:30
|
作者
Xiao, Zhiyong [1 ,2 ]
Strom, Robert G. [2 ]
Chapman, Clark R. [3 ]
Head, James W. [4 ]
Klimczak, Christian [5 ]
Ostrach, Lillian R. [6 ]
Helbert, Joern [7 ]
D'Incecco, Piero [7 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Fac Earth Sci, Planetary Sci Inst, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[3] SW Res Inst, Dept Space Studies, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Dept Geol Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Terr Magnetism, Washington, DC 20015 USA
[6] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[7] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt, Inst Planetary Res, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Cratering; Mercury; surface; Moon; Impact processes; OBLIQUE IMPACTS; WESTERN LIMB; LUNAR; SURFACE; VOLCANISM; BASINS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.icarus.2013.10.002
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The impact cratering process is usually divided into the coupling, excavation, and modification stages, where each stage is controlled by a combination of different factors. Although recognized as the main factors governing impact processes on airless bodies, the relative importance of gravity, target and projectile properties, and impact velocity in each stage is not well understood. We focus on the excavation stage to place better constraints on its controlling factors by comparing the morphology and scale of crater-exterior structures for similar-sized fresh complex craters on the Moon and Mercury. We find that the ratios of continuous ejecta deposits, continuous secondaries facies, and the largest secondary craters on the continuous secondaries facies between same-sized mercurian and lunar craters are consistent with predictions from gravity-regime crater scaling laws. Our observations support that gravity is a major controlling factor on the excavation stage of the formation of complex impact craters on the Moon and Mercury. On the other hand, similar-sized craters with identical background terrains on Mercury have different spatial densities of secondaries on the continuous secondaries facies, suggesting that impactor velocity may also be important during the excavation stage as larger impactor velocity may also cause greater ejection velocities. Moreover, some craters on Mercury have more circular and less clustered secondaries on the continuous secondaries facies than other craters on Mercury or the Moon. This morphological difference appears not to have been caused by the larger surface gravity or the larger median impact velocity on Mercury. A possible interpretation is that at some places on Mercury, the target material might have unique properties causing larger ejection angles during the impact excavation stage. We conclude that gravity is the major controlling factor on the impact excavation stage of complex craters, while impact velocity and target properties also affect the excavation stage but to a lesser extent than gravity. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 275
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] Re-examination of the Population, Stratigraphy, and Sequence of Mercurian Basins: Implications for Mercury's Early Impact History and Comparison With the Moon
    Orgel, Csilla
    Fassett, Caleb, I
    Michael, Gregory
    Riedel, Christian
    van der Bogert, Carolyn H.
    Hiesinger, Harald
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2020, 125 (08)
  • [22] Deriving Morphometric Parameters and the Simple-to-Complex Transition Diameter From a High-Resolution, Global Database of Fresh Lunar Impact Craters (D ≥∼ 3 km)
    Krueger, T.
    Hergarten, S.
    Kenkmann, T.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2018, 123 (10) : 2667 - 2690
  • [23] GRAIL gravity observations of the transition from complex crater to peak-ring basin on the Moon: Implications for crustal structure and impact basin formation
    Baker, David M. H.
    Head, James W.
    Phillips, Roger J.
    Neumann, Gregory A.
    Bierson, Carver J.
    Smith, David E.
    Zuber, Maria T.
    ICARUS, 2017, 292 : 54 - 73