Automated clustering of heterotrophic bacterioplankton in flow cytometry data

被引:8
|
作者
Garcia, Francisca C. [1 ]
Lopez-Urrutia, Angel [1 ]
Moran, Xose Anxelu G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Espanol Oceanog, Ctr Oceangraf Gijon, Gijon 33212, Asturias, Spain
关键词
Bacteria; Flow cytometry; Automatic clustering; Aquatic sciences; NUCLEIC-ACID CONTENT; BIOCONDUCTOR PACKAGE; PLANKTONIC BACTERIA; K-MEANS; PICOPLANKTON; POPULATIONS; SUBGROUPS; WATERS; CYCLE;
D O I
10.3354/ame01691
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Flow cytometry has become a standard method to analyze bacterioplankton. Analysis of samples by flow cytometry is automatic, but it is followed by manual classification of the bacterioplankton groups in flow cytometry standard (FCS) files. This classification is a time consuming and subjective task performed by manually drawing the limits of the groups present in cytograms, a process referred to as gating. The automation of flow cytometry data processing based on pattern recognition techniques could provide an efficient tool to overcome some of these disadvantages. Here, we propose the use of model-based clustering techniques for the automatic detection of low (LNA) and high (HNA) nucleic acid bacterioplankton groups in FCS files. To validate our method, we compared the automatic classification with a flow cytometry database from a 9 yr time series collected in the central Cantabrian Sea that had been manually analyzed. The correlation between automatic and manual gating methods was >0.9 for cell counts and 0.7 to 0.95 for side scatter values, a proxy of cell size. In addition, no significant differences were found in the mean annual cycle of LNA and HNA cell abundance depicted by both methods. We also quantified the subjectivity of manual gating. The coefficient of variation for heterotrophic bacteria counts obtained by different analysts was around 10 to 20%. Our results suggest that the combination of flow cytometry and automatic gating provides a valuable tool to analyze microbial communities objectively and accurately, allowing us to safely compare bacterioplankton samples from different environments.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 185
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of subgroups from flow cytometry measurements of heterotrophic bacterioplankton by image analysis
    Andreatta, S
    Wallinger, MM
    Posch, T
    Psenner, R
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 2001, 44 (03): : 218 - 225
  • [2] On Extensions of k-Means Clustering for Automated Gating of Flow Cytometry Data
    Luta, George
    [J]. CYTOMETRY PART A, 2011, 79A (01) : 3 - 5
  • [3] Comparing and Clustering Flow Cytometry Data
    Liu, Lin
    Xiong, Li
    Lu, James J.
    Gernert, Kim M.
    Hertzberg, Vicki
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 305 - +
  • [4] Automated Gating of flow cytometry data via robust model-based clustering
    Lo, Kenneth
    Brinkman, Ryan Remy
    Gottardo, Raphael
    [J]. CYTOMETRY PART A, 2008, 73A (04) : 321 - 332
  • [5] Autogating in Flow Cytometry Data using SVM Classifiers for Bacterioplankton Identification
    Cordeiro, Elionai Moura
    Wanderley, Bruno M. S.
    Amorim de Araujo, Daniel Sabino
    Doria Neto, Adriao Duarte
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (CSCI), 2017, : 1265 - 1269
  • [6] The automated subset assignment pipeline (ASAP) for data-driven clustering and automated analysis of flow cytometry immunophenotyping
    Solman, Isabelle
    Mongan, Ann
    Blum, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2019, 7
  • [7] Automated subset identification and characterization pipeline for multidimensional flow and mass cytometry data clustering and visualization
    Stephen Meehan
    Gleb A. Kolyagin
    David Parks
    Justin Youngyunpipatkul
    Leonore A. Herzenberg
    Guenther Walther
    Eliver E. B. Ghosn
    Darya Y. Orlova
    [J]. Communications Biology, 2
  • [8] Automated subset identification and characterization pipeline for multidimensional flow and mass cytometry data clustering and visualization
    Meehan, Stephen
    Kolyagin, Gleb A.
    Parks, David
    Youngyunpipatkul, Justin
    Herzenberg, Leonore A.
    Walther, Guenther
    Ghosn, Eliver E. B.
    Orlova, Darya Y.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2019, 2 (1)
  • [9] Automated analysis of flow cytometry data comes of age
    Brinkman, Ryan R.
    Aghaeepour, Nima
    Finak, Greg
    Gottardo, Raphael
    Mosmann, Tim
    Scheuermann, Richard H.
    [J]. CYTOMETRY PART A, 2016, 89A (01) : 13 - 15
  • [10] Automated analysis of bacterial flow cytometry data with FlowGateNIST
    Ross, David
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):