Behavioural and physiological consequences of a single social defeat in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats

被引:83
|
作者
Meerlo, P
Overkamp, GJF
Koolhaas, JM
机构
[1] UNIV GRONINGEN, DEPT BEHAV BIOL, NL-9750 AA HAREN, NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV GRONINGEN, DEPT ANIM PHYSIOL, NL-9750 AA HAREN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
Roman rat lines; genetic differences; social stress; body temperature; activity; open field; food intake; body weight;
D O I
10.1016/S0306-4530(96)00047-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The behavioural and physiological consequences of a single social defeat were studied in Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and Roman low-avoidance (RLA) rats, two rat lines with a genetically determined difference in the way of responding to or coping with stressors. Animals were subjected to social defeat by placing them in the cage of an aggressive male conspecific for 1 h. In both RHA and RLA rats, social defeat induced a profound increase in body temperature during the circadian resting phase, lasting for up to 10 days after the conflict. The increase in resting temperature was paralleled by a slight decrease in spontaneous home cage activity. Food intake and growth were suppressed for a number of days, resulting in a long-lasting lower body weight compared to non-stressed control animals. An open field test 2 days after defeat showed a social stress-induced decrease in locomotion in a novel environment. Despite the well-known differentiation between RHA and RLA rats in their behavioural and neuroendocrine response pattern to acute environmental challenges, the present study did not show major differences in the long-term consequences of social defeat. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:155 / 168
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Behavioral profile in ovariectomized female Hatano high- and low-avoidance rats
    Kawaguchi, Maiko
    Ohta, Ryo
    Makihara, Hiroko
    Watanabe, Gen
    Taya, Kazuyoshi
    Shimada, Tsutomu
    Aburata, Masaki
    Kato, Nobumasa
    Himi, Toshiyuki
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2010, 57 : S527 - S527
  • [22] Pain thresholds in genetically selected koltushi high- and low-avoidance rats
    Zhukov, DA
    Vinogradova, EP
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 1997, 47 (01) : 167 - 169
  • [23] AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED STEREOTYPIC RESPONSES IN ROMAN HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND ROMAN LOW-AVOIDANCE RATS
    DRISCOLL, P
    LIEBLICH, I
    COHEN, E
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1986, 24 (05) : 1329 - 1332
  • [24] One-way avoidance acquisition and cellular density in the basolateral amygdala: Strain differences in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats
    Jose Gomez, M.
    Moron, Ignacio
    Torres, Carmen
    Jose Esteban, Francisco
    de la Torre, Lourdes
    Candido, Antonio
    Maldonado, Antonio
    Fernandez-Teruel, Alberto
    Tobena, Adolf
    Dolores Escarabajal, M.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 450 (03) : 317 - 320
  • [25] Inbred roman high- and low-avoidance rats differ in the response induced by a convulsant dose of the GABA A antagonist pentylenetetrazole
    Tobeña, A
    Giménez-Llort, L
    Aguilar, R
    Gil, L
    Fernández-Teruel, A
    Escorihuela, RM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 : 105 - 105
  • [26] On the development of inhibition of delay by rats of the Syracuse High- and Low-Avoidance strains
    Brush, FR
    Gendron, CM
    ACTA NEUROBIOLOGIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 1998, 58 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [27] MATERNAL-BEHAVIOR DIFFERENCES IN ROMAN HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND LOW-AVOIDANCE RATS
    FUMM, H
    DRISCOLL, P
    BATTIG, K
    EXPERIENTIA, 1977, 33 (06): : 779 - 779
  • [28] DIFFERENTIAL PRONENESS TO LEARNED HELPLESSNESS IN ROMAN HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND LOW-AVOIDANCE RATS
    FITZGERALD, RE
    LAZEGA, D
    EXPERIENTIA, 1985, 41 (09): : 1217 - 1218
  • [29] DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM OF ROMAN HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND LOW-AVOIDANCE RATS
    DRISCOLL, P
    KASERMANN, HP
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG/DRUG RESEARCH, 1977, 27-2 (08): : 1582 - 1584
  • [30] Impulsivity Characterization in the Roman High- and Low-Avoidance Rat Strains: Behavioral and Neurochemical Differences
    Margarita Moreno
    Diana Cardona
    Maria José Gómez
    Fernando Sánchez-Santed
    Adolf Tobeña
    Alberto Fernández-Teruel
    Leticia Campa
    Cristina Suñol
    Maria Dolores Escarabajal
    Carmen Torres
    Pilar Flores
    Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010, 35 : 1198 - 1208