Concurrent Chemoradiation for Vaginal Cancer

被引:38
|
作者
Miyamoto, David T. [1 ]
Viswanathan, Akila N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Harvard Radiat Oncol Program, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; HIGH-DOSE-RATE; CERVICAL-CANCER; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; VULVA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0065048
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: It is not known whether the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy improves outcomes in primary vaginal cancer. Here, we review clinical outcomes in patients with primary vaginal cancer treated with radiation therapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Methods: Seventy-one patients with primary vaginal cancer treated with definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a single institution were identified and their records reviewed. A total of 51 patients were treated with RT alone; 20 patients were treated with CRT. Recurrences were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range, 18-92 years) and the median follow-up time among survivors was 3.0 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and DFS differed significantly between the RT and CRT groups (3-yr OS = 56% vs. 79%, log-rank p=0.037; 3-yr DFS = 43% vs. 73%, log-rank p=0.011). Twenty-three patients (45%) in the RT group had a relapse at any site compared to 3 (15%) in the CRT group (p=0.027). With regard to the sites of first relapse, 10 patients (14%) had local only, 4 (6%) had local and regional, 9 (13%) had regional only, 1 (1%) had regional and distant, and 2 (3%) had distant only relapse. On univariate analysis, the use of concurrent chemotherapy, FIGO stage, tumor size, and date of diagnosis were significant predictors of DFS. On multivariate analysis, the use of concurrent chemotherapy remained a significant predictor of DFS (hazard ratio 0.31 (95% CI, 0.10-0.97; p = 0.04)). Conclusions: Vaginal cancer results in poor outcomes. Adequate radiation dose is essential to ensure curative management. Concurrent chemotherapy should be considered for vaginal cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiation
    Kim, Tae-Eung
    Park, Byung-Joon
    Kwack, Hyun-Sung
    Kwon, Ji-Young
    Kim, Jang-Heub
    Yoon, Sei-Chul
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (11) : 1315 - 1320
  • [22] Gefitinib with concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Saini, Surendra Kumar
    Srivastava, Shely
    Dixit, Awadhesh Kumar
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2016, 15 (03): : 138 - 144
  • [23] Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy Using Proton Beams for Esophageal Cancer
    Ishikawa, H.
    Makishima, H.
    Takizawa, D.
    Mizumoto, M.
    Ohnishi, K.
    Murofushi, K.
    Sugawara, K.
    Tanaka, K.
    Kanuma, R.
    Okumura, T.
    Sakurai, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E130 - E130
  • [24] Concurrent Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer: Comparison of LDR and HDR Brachytherapy
    Lin, Alexander J.
    Samson, Pamela
    Zoberi, Jacqueline
    Garcia-Ramirez, Jose
    Williamson, Jeffrey
    Markovina, Stephanie
    Schwarz, Julie
    Grigsby, Perry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (05): : E18 - E19
  • [25] Gefitinib with concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced head neck cancer
    Saini, Surendra Kumar
    Srivastava, Shelly
    Dixit, Awadhesh Kumar
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2018, 17 (03): : 192 - 197
  • [26] Chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer: Toxicity of concurrent weekly cisplatin
    Ikushima H.
    Osaki K.
    Furutani S.
    Yamashita K.
    Kawanaka T.
    Kishida Y.
    Iwamoto S.
    Takegawa Y.
    Kudoh T.
    Nishitani H.
    Radiation Medicine, 2006, 24 (2): : 115 - 121
  • [27] A comparative study of sequential chemoradiation vs concurrent chemoradiation vs concurrent chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy in unresectable NSCLC
    Datta, A.
    Choudhury, K. B.
    Majumdar, A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (04) : S65 - S66
  • [28] A systematic review of incidence of vaginal toxicities following chemoradiation in cervical cancer
    Raj, Shraddha
    Prasad, Rajiv Ranjan
    Swati, Swati
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Devi, Seema
    Sinha, Dinesh Kumar
    Madhawi, Richa
    Kishor, Kunal
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S997 - S999
  • [29] Impact of anemia in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.
    Nolan, Nicole
    Grecula, John C.
    Blakaj, Dukagjin
    Diavolitsis, Virginia Maria
    Bhatt, Aashish D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [30] A new model for concurrent chemoradiation in advanced oropharyngeal cancer: an Indian experience
    Mallik, S.
    Saha, S.
    Dasgupta, P.
    Basu, A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 293 - 293