Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome

被引:50
|
作者
Drukker, C. A. [1 ]
van Tinteren, H. [2 ]
Schmidt, M. K. [3 ]
Rutgers, E. J. Th. [1 ]
Bernards, R. [4 ,5 ]
van de Vijver, M. J. [6 ,7 ]
van't Veer, L. J. [5 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Biometr, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Mol Pathol, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Mol Carcinogenesis, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Agendia Inc, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Lab Med, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[9] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Mol Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Risk prediction; Gene signature; 70-gene signature; PROGNOSIS-SIGNATURE; GENE-EXPRESSION; VALIDATION; WOMEN; PREDICTOR; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2831-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Several studies have validated the prognostic value of the 70-gene prognosis signature (MammaPrint(R)), but long-term outcome prediction of these patients has not been previously reported. The follow-up of the consecutively treated cohort of 295 patients (< 53 years) with invasive breast cancer (T1-2N0-1M0; n = 151 N0, n = 144 N1) diagnosed between 1984 and 1995, in which the 70-gene signature was previously validated, was updated. The median follow-up for this series is now extended to 18.5 years. A significant difference is seen in long-term distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for the patients with a low- and a high-risk 70-gene signature (DMFS p < 0.0001), as well as separately for node-negative (DMFS p < 0.0001) and node-positive patients (DMFS p = 0.0004). The 25-year hazard ratios (HRs) for all patients for DMFS and OS were 3.1 (95 % CI 2.02-4.86) and 2.9 (95 % CI 1.90-4.28), respectively. The HRs for DMFS and OS were largest in the first 5 years after diagnosis: 9.6 (95 % CI 4.2-22.1) and 11.3 (95 % CI 3.5-36.4), respectively. The 25-year HRs in the subgroup of node-negative patients for DMFS and OS were 4.57 (95 % CI 2.31-9.04) and 4.73 (95 % CI 2.46-9.07), respectively, and for node-positive patients for DMFS and OS were 2.24 (95 % CI 1.25-4.00) and 1.83 (95 % CI 1.07-3.11), respectively. The 70-gene signature remains prognostic at longer follow-up in patients < 53 years of age with stage I and II breast cancer. The 70-gene signature's strongest prognostic power is seen in the first 5 years after diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 592
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Use in current clinical practice of 70-gene signature in early breast cancer
    Bighin, Claudia
    Del Mastro, Lucia
    Canavese, Giuseppe
    Carli, Franca
    Taveggia, Paola
    Levaggi, Alessia
    Giraudi, Sara
    Pronzato, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (11) : 2736 - 2737
  • [23] 70-gene signature to select breast cancer patients for neoadjuvant endocrine treatment
    Jacobs, C. F.
    Bartels, S. A. L.
    Loo, C. E.
    Smorenburg, C.
    Linn, S.
    Wesseling, J.
    van Duijnhoven, F.
    Kok, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S322 - S323
  • [24] The 70-gene MammaPrint signature is predictive for chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer
    Knauer, M.
    Straver, M.
    Rutgers, E.
    Bender, R.
    Cardoso, F.
    Mook, S.
    van de Vijver, M.
    Saghatchian, M.
    Koornstra, R.
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, J.
    Rodenhuis, S.
    Linn, S.
    van 't Veer, L.
    BREAST, 2009, 18 : S36 - S37
  • [25] Combining method of detection and 70-gene signature for enhanced prognostication of breast cancer
    Lopes Cardozo, J. M. N.
    Schmidt, M. K.
    van 't Veer, L. J.
    Cardoso, F.
    Poncet, C.
    Rutgers, E. J. T.
    Drukker, C. A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 189 (02) : 399 - 410
  • [26] The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
    Michael Knauer
    Stella Mook
    Emiel J. T. Rutgers
    Richard A. Bender
    Michael Hauptmann
    Marc J. van de Vijver
    Rutger H. T. Koornstra
    Jolien M. Bueno-de-Mesquita
    Sabine C. Linn
    Laura J. van ’t Veer
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 120 : 655 - 661
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the 70-gene signature for node-negative breast cancer
    Retel, V. P.
    Joore, M. A.
    Knauer, M.
    Linn, S. C.
    Hauptmann, M.
    van Harten, W. H.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 214 - 214
  • [28] A 70-Gene Signature for Predicting Treatment Outcome in Advanced-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Ngoc Ngo Yen Nguyen
    Choi, Tae Gyu
    Kim, Jieun
    Jung, Min Hyung
    Ko, Seok Hoon
    Shin, Yoonhwa
    Kang, Insug
    Ha, Joohun
    Kim, Sung Soo
    Jo, Yong Hwa
    MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS, 2020, 19 : 47 - 56
  • [29] 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Cardoso, F.
    van't Veer, L. J.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Slaets, L.
    Viale, G.
    Delaloge, S.
    Pierga, J. -Y.
    Brain, E.
    Causeret, S.
    DeLorenzi, M.
    Glas, A. M.
    Golfinopoulos, V.
    Goulioti, T.
    Knox, S.
    Matos, E.
    Meulemans, B.
    Neijenhuis, P. A.
    Nitz, U.
    Passalacqua, R.
    Ravdin, P.
    Rubio, I. T.
    Saghatchian, M.
    Smilde, T. J.
    Sotiriou, C.
    Stork, L.
    Straehle, C.
    Thomas, G.
    Thompson, A. M.
    van der Hoeven, J. M.
    Vuylsteke, P.
    Bernards, R.
    Tryfonidis, K.
    Rutgers, E.
    Piccart, M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (08): : 717 - 729
  • [30] Comparing the 70-gene signature to the Dutch Breast Cancer guidelines in the prospective RASTER study
    Drukker, C. A.
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M.
    Retel, V. P.
    Van Harten, W. H.
    Van Tinteren, H.
    Wesseling, J.
    Van 't Veer, L. J.
    Rutgers, E. J. T.
    Van de Vijver, M. J.
    Linn, S. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S402 - S403