The Application of Appraisal Theory to the Legal Argumentation of Court Judgment: Taking the Case of Liu Yong as an Example

被引：0

作者：

Zhang, Chenquan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Guangdong Second Univ Educ, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LAW, TRANSLATION AND CULTURE: ADVANCES IN LAW AND LANGUAGES | 2012年

关键词：

appraisal theory; system of attitude; legal argumentation; Liu Yong's case;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

In this paper we report a functional analysis of the legal argumentation of the criminal judgment for Liu Yong's case by the Supreme Court of the P.R.C, that is, to have an appraisal discussion about the participants in the clause process, hoping to explain legally why the Supreme Court revised the judgment of the second instance and to give a preliminary linguistic discussion on the potential changes brought about by the appraisal theory for the writing-format of a criminal judgment. It is shown that Systemic-Functional approach can play an important rule in legal reasoning.

引用

页码：256 / 262

页数：7

共 43 条

[21] Vaccination Obligation from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights——Taking the Case of Varif et al.v. Czech Republic as an Example
陈云良
莫婷婷
LI Dongli
The Journal of Human Rights, 2022, 21 (06) : 1158 - 1177
[22] Gloss to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of November 3, 2009 in the case of Lautsi versus Italy (application no. 30814/06)
Wisniewski, Adam
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2011, (05): : 170 - 184
[23] The Application of the Pilot Judgment Procedure and Other Forms of Handling Large-Scale Dysfunctions in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
Czepek, Jakub
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LAW REVIEW, 2018, 20 (3-4) : 347 - 373
[24] KEY ASPECTS OF THE VIOLATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF PUBLIC SPENDING IN THE ERE CASE: ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF SEVILLE NO. 490/2019, DATED NOVEMBER 19
Fernandez Ajenjo, Jose Antonio
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO PENAL, 2021, (35):
[25] The topical example of the judicial application of a Convention of uniform law not ratified by a State, Note on the judgment of the Tunisian Supreme Court No. 49986 dated 8 July 2010 on factoring
Bouraoui, Fatma
UNIFORM LAW REVIEW, 2014, 19 (03) : 365 - 389
[26] Gloss to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of March 20, 2007 in the case of Tysiac v. Poland ( application no. 5410/03)
Krolikowski, Michal
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2007, (03): : 200 - 211
[27] Taking Care of Strasbourg: The Status of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights in Kosovo's Domestic Legal System
Korenica, Fisnik
Doli, Dren
LIVERPOOL LAW REVIEW, 2011, 32 (03): : 209 - 223
[28] THE WAYHOW JUDGE HERCULES SHOULD DECIDE. ANALYSIS AND DESCRIPTION OF THE THEORY OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION FROM THE VISION OF RONALD DWORKIN. ESTUDY OF CASE BASED IN THE COLOMBIAN JURISPRUDENCE
Guette Hernandez, David Modesto
Rodriguez Cuadrado, Angie Carolina
REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO, 2021, 48 (02): : 231 - 256
[29] The European Court of Human Rights: The Grand Chamber judgment of March 15, 2012 in the case of Sitaropoulos and Giakoumopoulos v. Greece, Application No. 42202/07
Sulkowski, Jaroslaw
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2012, (05): : 227 - 234
[30] Jurisprudence of other courts Gloss to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of June 15, 2010 in the case of Grzelak v. Poland (Application no. 7710/02)
Lacki, Pawel
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2011, (02): : 194 - 204

← 1 2 3 4 5 →